- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Weekly paclitaxel plus trastuzumab in metastatic breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines-a phase II multipractice study
© John et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 17 August 2011
Accepted: 12 March 2012
Published: 4 May 2012
The 3-weekly combination of trastuzumab and paclitaxel has been approved for the treatment of advanced breast cancer based on a large pivotal study. However, mono and combination chemotherapy trials suggest that weekly paclitaxel has a better therapeutic index, especially in the palliative setting. The present trial examined the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel over a limited duration combined with continued trastuzumab in HER2+ patients.
Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer overexpressing HER2 were eligible if pretreated with anthracycline in either the adjuvant or palliative setting. Treatment consisted of weekly trastuzumab (2 mg/kg/week for up to one year after a loading dose of 4 mg/kg in week 1) and paclitaxel (90 mg/m², administered in weeks 1–6 and 8–13).
Twenty-seven German centers enrolled 121 patients. The median number of metastatic sites was two (range 1–5); 38% of patients had received chemotherapy for advanced disease. After a median 42 weeks of trastuzumab treatment, limited by disease progression in roughly half the patients, a best objective response rate (complete response + partial response) of 76% was achieved, including complete remissions in 29%. 74% of patients lived without tumor progression at six months. Median progression-free and overall survival were 9.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1–11.3) and 22 months (95% CI: 17–46). After alopecia, Common Toxicity Criteria grade ≥2 toxicity was predominantly hematological (leukopenia [31%] and anemia [41%]); however, thrombocytopenia occurred in only 5%. Neurotoxicity was remarkably low. Two cardiac events (grades 2 and 3) were presumed treatment-related.
Weekly paclitaxel plus trastuzumab allows an increased dose density and offers an attractive and effective alternative to the conventional schedule. Limiting the duration of cytotoxic therapy to 3 months seems to be an option to reduce neurotoxicity without impairing long-term outcome.
Recent advances in understanding cancer biology have spurred the development of a plethora of targeted agents that have revolutionized the treatment of a number of malignancies. Their mechanism of action often depends on specific molecular features allowing for individualized strategies, in contrast to the non-selective approaches of the conventional chemotherapy era. The best known and most successful example was the discovery that 20 to 25% of advanced breast cancer patients overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) . This led to the development of trastuzumab (Herceptin®), a humanized monoclonal antibody against this epitope  that shows considerable antitumor efficacy as a single agent even in heavily pretreated patients with advanced disease [3, 4].
Nevertheless, based on preclinical evidence of synergy , the major breakthrough of this targeted approach was to combine the antibody with cytostatic drugs, in both early and advanced disease . The pivotal randomized phase III study on combination trastuzumab in advanced breast cancer allowed for two chemotherapy backbones: either doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide or single-agent paclitaxel, both given 3-weekly . While added trastuzumab increased response and survival rates in each of these strata, combination with anthracyclines unexpectedly increased cardiotoxicity  (although less markedly with epirubicin ), impeding its widespread use and favoring taxane-oriented strategies.
During the same period evidence emerged that weekly (rather than 3-weekly) paclitaxel achieved high antitumor activity thanks to a considerably increased dose intensity and/or densitiy, yet with no apparent increase in overall toxicity [9, 10]. We therefore assessed the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel over a recommended duration of just 3 months while continuing trastuzumab in HER2-positive patients with advanced breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines.
The non-commercial multicenter study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (1996 version). Approval was gained from the institutional review boards of all 27 participating centers and each patient gave prior written informed consent.
Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer overexpressing HER2 were eligible if pretreated with anthracycline in either the adjuvant or palliative setting. HER2 positivity was defined as 2+ or 3+ overexpression using the DAKO HercepTest™, confirmed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) if 2+. Non-inclusion criteria were >1 chemotherapy for advanced disease, taxane or trastuzumab pretreatment, brain metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status >1 at screening, pregnancy or lactation, childbearing potential without reliable contraception, clinically significant cardiac disease, neutrophils <1500/μl, platelets <75,000/μl, and total bilirubin and creatinine >1.5 × the upper limit of normal.
Patients received an intravenous (iv) loading dose of trastuzumab 4 mg/kg body weight on day 0 over an infusion duration of 90 min, followed by an infusion of paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 over 1 hour on day 1. From day 8, the same paclitaxel regimen and infusions of trastuzumab 2 mg/kg body weight were administered on the same day every week. The cytotoxic drug was given over two 6-week blocks separated by a 14-day break, with optional prolongation at the physician’s discretion; the antibody was continued weekly until disease progression. Premedication (all iv) was dexamethasone 10 mg, clemastine 2 mg, and ranitidine 50 mg.
The paclitaxel dose was reduced to 75 mg/m2 in the event of grade 3/4 hematotoxicity, and stopped completely in the event of grade 3 neurotoxicity or severe hypersensitivity reactions. Termination of trastuzumab was considered in the event of persisting asymptomatic deterioration of left ventricular ejection fraction or symptomatic heart disease.
Evaluation of safety and efficacy
Baseline documentation included demographics, medical and treatment history, cardiac function, and HER/2neu status. Vital signs, ECOG performance status, and complete blood counts were recorded at baseline and each weekly visit, serum chemistry at baseline and 4-weekly. Tumor assessment comprised physical examination and radiology at baseline, after each paclitaxel treatment block, and 8-weekly thereafter. Tumor response and progression were evaluated using World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Time to progression was defined as the period between study enrolment and progression or death, whichever occurred first. Cotreatments and adverse events (graded using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria NCI-CTC) were recorded continuously throughout the study. Electrocardiography and echocardiography were repeated 12-weekly.
The primary objective of this phase II study was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. 115 patients were required to discriminate a promising 50% PFS rate from a futile finding of 35% with both type I and II errors of 5% . All other parameters were analyzed descriptively in terms of standard distribution parameters such as rates, means with standard deviations, quartiles, and ranges. Event-related data (PFS, overall survival) were estimated using the product limit method of Kaplan and Meier . Two-sided logrank tests were used to compare prognostic subgroups .
Patient and tumor characteristics (n = 108)
Mean ± standard deviation
58.4 ± 10.2
ECOG performance status on chemotherapy day 1
FISH +/no immunohistochemistry or other
Tumor grade (n = 102)
Metastatic sites at onset of study treatment (n)
Mean ± standard deviation
1.8 ± 0.9
Organ site involvement
Lymph nodes, non-regional
Adjuvant endocrine therapy
Palliative endocrine therapy
Adverse event frequency and severity (maximum National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [NCI CTC] grade per category)
Adverse event/ organ system
Patients per NCI CTC grade [n (%)]
White blood cells
Discussion and conclusions
As the first therapeutic antibody approved for solid tumors, trastuzumab was introduced into the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer based on a pivotal randomized study assessing its efficacy in combination with cytostatic drugs: combination with 3-weekly paclitaxel clearly outperformed chemotherapy alone, achieving an overall response rate of 41%, a median time to progression of 6.9 months, and overall survival of 22 months . This was confirmed by corresponding results of 36%, 7.1 and 32 months in the control arm of a US Oncology trial comparing this combination to a three-drug regimen comprising paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and carboplatin . Smaller phase II studies on the combination of the HER2 antibody with docetaxel have reported response rates of 50 to 70% [15–17].
Weekly paclitaxel proved a dose-dense alternative to the 3-weekly regimen, achieving at least similar activity in breast and lung cancer, and showing some advantages in terms of feasibility and decreased toxicity. The results of our trial, notably a median PFS of 9.4 months and an overall survival of 22 months, compare favorably to the phase III findings mentioned above, despite including 37% of patients with previous palliative chemotherapy. The intention-to-treat response rate of 74% is considerably higher, but this may be due to the more rigorous focus on remission confirmation in pivotal studies. A number of smaller phase II studies have also investigated the weekly administration of both drugs, likewise reporting high response rates of 56 to 74% in patient populations with varying amounts of pretreatment [18–21]. Seidman et al.  administered a regimen similar to ours to patients with a comparable rate of palliative pretreatment (30%), and achieved responses in about 70% of HER2-positive patients, with a median response duration of 7 months. The smaller studies by Fountzilas et al.  in 34 patients with no cytotoxic pretreatment for advanced disease, and Gori et al.  in 25 patients, most of whom had been heavily pretreated, showed similar efficacy with remission rates of 62% and 56%, and median PFS of 9 and 8.6 months. Thus all these trials, including our own with over 100 patients, are highly consistent in reporting a level of efficacy that may be slightly superior to that seen with the 3-weekly taxane regimen. The only randomized comparison of 3-weekly vs weekly paclitaxel comes from the CALGB 9840 study, which was also amended to incorporate trastuzumab for all HER2-positive patients and on a randomized basis for HER2-negative patients . The dose-dense schedule showed significantly superior response and time to progression, plus a distinctly favorable trend in overall survival and, as expected, no major antibody benefit in HER2-negative patients.
Two phase II studies adding carboplatin to paclitaxel and trastuzumab suggested even greater efficacy with response rates >80% and median PFS markedly exceeding 1 year [23, 24]. However, these results were achieved in first-line patients only and must be weighed against substantial grade 3 to 4 myelosuppression. Weekly docetaxel + trastuzumab also appears a feasible combination but has been investigated in very few patients .
As for safety, the randomized CALGB trial  suggested that weekly, uninterrupted paclitaxel caused more neuropathy and less hematotoxicity than the conventional schedule, reflecting the clinical challenge of balancing toxicity and efficacy in the optimization of palliative treatment. However, in contrast to the other phase II/III studies of weekly trastuzumab/paclitaxel [18, 20–22] which maintained the cytotoxic component until progression or toxicity in most patients, we preferred to introduce a two weeks break and, more importantly, to limit the duration of chemotherapy so that it eventually lasted for less than one third the median total duration of trastuzumab treatment. As a consequence, we had to terminate treatment because of toxicity in only 6% of patients, while the total median duration of trastuzumab treatment (42 weeks) was distinctly longer than in the other phase II trials that reported median therapy periods of less than half a year. This was consistent with the low rate of severe sensory neuropathy (5%), contrasting with the approximate 25% reported by Seidman et al. [20, 22]. Despite the anthracycline pretreatment in all our patients, cardiotoxicity was rare, with clinical symptoms reported in two cases only. This compares favorably with the 11% grade 3–4 myocardial dysfunction found in the pivotal study with 3-weekly paclitaxel . The other phase II trials of weekly paclitaxel reported rates of 2–8% but prior anthracycline was not a mandatory selection criterion in the two larger studies [18, 20].
We consider our schedule combining two 6-week courses of paclitaxel with concurrent and continued trastuzumab to be a highly effective option feasible in the vast majority of patients despite anthracycline pretreatment. The finding in a recent meta-analysis that continuation of first-line chemotherapy until disease progression has at best a marginal effect on overall survival in most patients  only bolsters the rationale for our de-escalated approach.
The conduct of the trial was supported by unrestricted grants from Roche Pharma AG, Grenzach, Germany, and Bristol-Myers Squibb GmbH, Munich, Germany. These sponsors were not involved in the writing of the manuscript, but were allowed to comment on the draft versions.
- Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL: Human breast cancer: Correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science. 1987, 235 (4785): 177-182. 10.1126/science.3798106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hudis CA: Trastuzumab – mechanism of action and use in clinical practice. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357 (1): 39-51. 10.1056/NEJMra043186.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baselga J, Tripathy D, Mendelsohn J, Baughman S, Benz CC, Dantis L, Sklarin NT, Seidman AD, Hudis CA, Moore J, Rosen PP, Twaddell T, Henderson IC, Norton L: Phase II study of weekly intravenous recombinant humanized anti-p185HER2 monoclonal antibody in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1996, 14 (3): 737-744.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cobleigh MA, Vogel CL, Tripathy D, Robert NJ, Scholl S, Fehrenbacher L, Wolter JM, Paton V, Shak S, Lieberman G, Slamon DJ: Multinational study of the efficacy and safety of humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in women who have HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after chemotherapy for metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol. 1999, 179 (9): 2639-2648.Google Scholar
- Pegram MD, Pienkowski T, Northfelt DW, Eiermann W, Patel R, Fumoleau P, Quan E, Crown J, Toppmeyer D, Smylie M, Riva A, Blitz S, Press MF, Reese D, Lindsay MA, Slamon DJ: Results of two open-label, multicenter phase II studies of docetaxel, platinum salts, and trastuzumab in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004, 96 (10): 759-769. 10.1093/jnci/djh133.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, Fleming T, Eiermann W, Wolter J, Pegram M, Baselga J, Norton L: Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpress HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001, 344 (11): 783-792. 10.1056/NEJM200103153441101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seidman A, Hudis C, Pierri MK, Shak S, Paton V, Ashby M, Murphy M, Stewart SJ, Keefe D: Cardiac dysfunction in the trastuzumab clinical trials experience. J Clin Oncol. 2002, 20 (5): 1215-1221. 10.1200/JCO.20.5.1215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Untch M, Muscholl M, Tjulandin S, Jonat W, Meerpohl HG, Lichinitser M, Manikhas AG, Coumbos A, Kreienberg R, du Bois A, Harbeck N, Jackisch C, Müller V, Pauschinger M, Thomssen C, Lehle M, Catalani O, Lück HJ: First-line trastuzumab plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide therapy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer: cardiac safety and efficacy data from the Herceptin, Cyclophosphamide, and Epirubicin (HERCULES) trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28 (9): 1473-1480. 10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9709.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seidman AD, Hudis CA, Albanell J, Tong W, Tepler I, Currie V, Moynahan ME, Theodoulou M, Gollub M, Baselga J, Norton L: Dose-dense therapy with weekly 1-hour paclitaxel infusions in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998, 16 (10): 3353-3361.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perez EA, Vogel CL, Irwin DH, Kirshner JJ, Patel R: Multicenter phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel in women with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001, 19 (22): 4216-4223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fleming TR: One-sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials. Biometrics. 1982, 38 (1): 143-151. 10.2307/2530297.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958, 53: 457-481. 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peto R, Peto J: Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures. J R Stat Soc A. 1972, 135 (Part 2): 185-207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Robert N, Leyland-Jones B, Asmar L, Belt R, Ilegbodu D, Loesch D, Raju R, Valentine E, Sayre R, Cobleigh M, Albain K, McCullough C, Fuchs L, Slamon D: Randomized phase III study of trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin compared with trastuzumab and paclitaxel in women with HER-2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24 (18): 2786-2792. 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.1764.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marty M, Cognetti F, Maraninchi D, Snyder R, Mauriac L, Tubiana-Hulin M, Chan S, Grimes D, Antón A, Lluch A, Kennedy J, O’Byrne K, Conte P, Green M, Ward C, Mayne K, Extra JM: Randomized phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab combined with docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer administered as first-line treatment: the M77001 study group. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23 (19): 4265-4274. 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.173.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marty M, Cognetti F, Maraninchi D, et al: Superior long-term survival benefits of trastuzumab plus docetaxel compared to docetaxel alone in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: patients surviving more than 4 years in the M77001 study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006, 100 (suppl 1): S101-Abstr 2067Google Scholar
- Wardley A, Anton-Torres A, Pivot X, et al: Trastuzumab plus docetaxel with or without capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer: First efficacy results from the Phase II MO 16419 (CHAT) study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006, 100 (suppl 1): S101-Abstr 2063Google Scholar
- Fountzilas G, Tsavdaridis D, Kalogera-Fountzila A, Christodoulou CH, Timotheadou E, Kalofonos CH, Kosmidis P, Adamou A, Papakostas P, Gogas H, Stathopoulos G, Razis E, Bafaloukos D, Skarlos D: Weekly paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy and trastuzumab in patients with advanced breast cancer. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group phase II study. Ann Oncol. 2001, 12 (11): 1545-1551. 10.1023/A:1013184301155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gasparini G, Morabito A, De Sio L, et al: Preliminary clinical results of a randomized phase IIb study of weekly paclitaxel +/− trastuzumab as first-line therapy of patients with HER-2/neu positive metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003, 82 (suppl 1): S51-Abstr 227Google Scholar
- Seidman AD, Fornier MN, Esteva FJ, Tan L, Kaptain S, Bach A, Panageas KS, Arroyo C, Valero V, Currie V, Gilewski T, Theodoulou M, Moynahan ME, Moasser M, Sklarin N, Dickler M, D’Andrea G, Cristofanilli M, Rivera E, Hortobagyi GN, Norton L, Hudis CA: Weekly trastuzumab and paclitaxel therapy for metastatic breast cancer with analysis of efficacy by HER2 immunophenotype and gene amplification. J Clin Oncol. 2001, 19 (10): 2587-2595.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gori S, Colozza M, Mosconi AM, Franceschi E, Basurto C, Cherubini R, Sidoni A, Rulli A, Bisacci C, De Angelis V, Crinò L, Tonato M: Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel and trastuzumab in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004, 90 (1): 36-40. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601485.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Seidman AD, Berry D, Cirrincione C, Harris L, Muss H, Marcom PK, Gipson G, Burstein H, Lake D, Shapiro DL, Ungaro P, Norton L, Winer E, Hudis C: Randomised phase III trial of weekly compared with every-3-weeks paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer, with trastuzumab for all HER-2 overexpressors and random assignment to trastuzumab or not in HER-2 nonoverexpressors: Final results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 9840. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26 (10): 1642-1649. 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.6699.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perez EA, Suman VJ, Rowland KM, Ingle JN, Salim M, Loprinzi CL, Flynn PJ, Mailliard JA, Kardinal CG, Krook JE, Thrower AR, Visscher DW, Jenkins RB: Two concurrent phase II trials of paclitaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab (weekly or every-3-week schedule) as first-line therapy in women with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer: NCCTG study 983252. Clin Breast Cancer. 2005, 6 (5): 425-432. 10.3816/CBC.2005.n.047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burris H, Yardley D, Jones S, Houston G, Broome C, Thompson D, Greco FA, White M, Hainsworth J: Phase II trial of trastuzumab followed by weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22 (9): 1621-1629. 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.065.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bullock K, Blackwell K: Clinical efficacy of taxane-trastuzumab combination regimens for HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist. 2008, 13 (5): 515-525. 10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gennari A, Stockler M, Puntoni M, Sormani M, Nanni O, Amadori D, Wilcken N, D’Amico M, DeCensi A, Bruzzi P: Duration of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2011, 29 (16): 2144-2149. 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.5374.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://0-www.biomedcentral.com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1471-2407/12/165/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.