Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Cost-effectiveness of a 21-gene recurrence score assay versus Canadian clinical practice in women with early-stage estrogen- or progesterone-receptor-positive, axillary lymph-node negative breast cancer

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Doug Coyle
8 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sonal Gandhi
7 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Malek Hannouf
Resubmission - Version 2
7 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Doug Coyle
31 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sonal Gandhi
30 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chris Skedgel
21 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Malek Hannouf
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
23 Sep 2012 Editorially accepted
2 Oct 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-12-447

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement