Interpretation of the incremental impact of the RS-assay compared to CCP | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable (range tested) | Negative cost and effect | Cost savings | ICER in the range | ICER in the range | ICER in the range | Dominated | |
0 to 20,000 $/QALY gained | 20,000 to 100,000 $/QALY gained | > 100,000 $/QALY gained | |||||
Chemotherapy treated women in intermediate risk group by the RS-assay (0% to 100%) | Â | Â | 86% to 100% | 42% to 85% | 32% to 41% | 0% to 31% | |
Change in absolute risk of relapseb in the RS-assay model (−10% to +10%) |  |  | < −3% | −3% to +0.9% | +1% to +2% | > +2% | |
Change in utility of recurrencec (−10% to +10%) | Lower limit cost of recurrencec |  |  |  | < +9% | ≥ +9% |  |
Baseline cost of recurrencec |  |  |  | −10% to +10% |  |  | |
Upper limit cost of recurrencec |  |  |  | −10% to +10% |  |  | |
Change in utility following adjuvant chemotherapy (−10% to +10%) |  |  | > 4.5% | −0.8% to +4.5% | −2.4% to −0.9% | ≤ −2.5% |