- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Statins and the risk of gastric cancer in diabetes patients
- Jeeyun Lee†1,
- Soo Hyeon Lee†1, 3,
- Kyu Yeon Hur2,
- Sook Young Woo4,
- Sun Woo Kim4 and
- Won Ki Kang1Email author
© Lee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Received: 7 May 2011
- Accepted: 4 December 2012
- Published: 13 December 2012
Several studies have suggested a cancer risk reduction in statin users although the evidence remains weak for stomach cancer. The purpose of this study was to use an exact-matching case–control design to examine the risk of gastric cancer associated with the use of statins in a cohort of patients with diabetes.
Cases were defined as patients with incident gastric cancer identified by International Classification of Diseases 16.0 ~ 16.9 recorded at Samsung Medical Center database during the period of 1999 to 2008, at least 6 months after the entry date of diabetes code. Each gastric cancer case patient was matched with one control patient from the diabetes patient registry in a 1:1 fashion, blinded to patient outcomes.
A total of 983 cases with gastric cancer and 983 controls without gastric cancer, matched by age and sex, were included in the analysis. The presence of prescription for any statin was inversely associated with gastric cancer risk in the unadjusted conditional logistic regression model (OR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.14 – 0.24; P < .0001). Multivariate analysis using conditional logistic regression with Bonferroni’s correction against aspirin indicated a significant reduction in the risk of gastric cancer in diabetes patients with statin prescriptions (OR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.16 – 0.28; P < .0001). After adjustment for aspirin use, a longer duration of statin use was associated with reduced risk of gastric cancer, with statistical significance (P<.0001).
A strong inverse association was found between the risk of gastric adenocarcinoma and statin use in diabetic patients.
- Gastric cancer
Gastric cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with an incidence of 18.9/100,000 per year and a mortality rate of 14.7/100,000 per year . It is also the most common cancer type in Korea. Despite the worldwide prevalence of gastric cancer, its chemoprevention has been relatively poorly studied.
Several large-scale epidemiology studies have highlighted the potential anti-tumor effect of statins on various solid tumors. Statins are synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors that are commonly used drugs for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Statins inhibit the rate-limiting step of the mevalonate pathway that produces mevalonic acid, the precursor for the biosynthesis of isoprenoid molecules such as cholesterol, dolichol, and ubiquinone. Mevalonate-derived prenyl groups, farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP), and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP) facilitate essential intracellular functions of various proteins such as Ras and Rho [1–3]. One of the first large-scaled epidemiologic studies, the MECC (The Molecular Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer) study, demonstrated that the use of statins for more than 5 years was associated with a 47 percent relative reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer, after adjustment for other known risk factors such as age, sex, ethnic group, hypercholesterolemia, history of colorectal cancer in a first-degree relative, and level of vegetable consumption . Although the results from these studies support the hypothesis that statins may reduce the risk of cancer, overall results from observational studies still remain inconclusive, since subsequent studies showed no significant association between statins and cancer occurrence .
Recently, several interesting studies have analyzed the risk of cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) who were on statin therapy. Among these studies, the Hong Kong group analyzed a DM cohort of 5,276 patients and found a decreased risk of cancer in non-statin users and co-presence of high LDL cholesterol . In contrast, statin non-users with low LDL cholesterol and albuminuria had a 4.9-fold risk for any cancer when compared with statin users . The same research group also demonstrated that statins reduced cancer risk in DM patients, potentially via normalizing hydroxymethylgutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) and the insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) signaling pathway . In addition, statin use was associated with a significant 38% reduction in the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma among DM patients . For gastric cancer, a recent meta-analysis demonstrated a potential protective effect of statins, with median risk ratio of 0.59 (range, 0.40 – 0.88) . A nested case control study reported an odds ratio of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.72 – 1.02) for stomach cancer based con 1,992 cases and 8,279 controls . Nevertheless, the evidence remains weak and no large-scaled epidemiologic studies have yet been conducted to specifically analyze the risk of gastric cancer and its association with statin use.
We undertook this study to examine the risk of gastric cancer associated with the use of statins using an exact matching case–control design nested in a cohort of patients with diabetes. We also investigated the potential association between duration of statin use and the risk of gastric cancer.
We first identified a large cohort of patients with DM who were treated at Samsung Medical Center. In this study, study cases were defined as patients who were diagnosed with gastric cancer at least 6 months after the entry date of the diabetes code. Gastric cancer was identified by International Classification of Diseases 16.0 ~ 16.9 recorded at Samsung Medical Center database during the period of 1999 to 2008. Cases were excluded if gastric cancer was diagnosed shortly after or before the diagnosis of diabetes: any gastric cancer cases diagnosed within 6 months of the diagnosis of diabetes were excluded from this study. All included cases were pathologically or cytologically diagnosed at our center. Each gastric cancer case patient was matched with one control patient from the diabetes patient registry, in a 1:1 fashion that was blinded to patient outcomes. Matching variables were age (exact) and sex at an index date, which was the date of the gastric cancer diagnosis for each case. We excluded patients who had no prescription record available in our database or those who were followed up at our hospital for less than 1 year.
Exposure to statins
Statin prescriptions were collected from our electronic prescription record system. Statins included simvastatin, atorvastatin, lovastatin, rosuvastatin, pitavastatin, pravastatin, and cerivastatin. We collected the dates of filled prescriptions, daily dose, number of days supplied, and the number of pills per prescription. In the cases of statin prescribed before visiting Samsung Medical Center, we utilized the electronic drug identification system at our center, which identifies the drug and dosage to hospital pharmacists upon consultation. As a routine practice, we consult all of the outside prescription drugs with hospital pharmacists to verify identification of drugs. We collected prescription information on aspirin, nonstatin lipid-lowering medications (cholestyramine, colestipol, and niacin), and triglyceride-lowering medications (clofibrate, fenofibrate, and gemfibrozil). Statin users were defined as those who had statin filled prescriptions for at least 6 months.
Clinical data validation
All of the inpatient and outpatient charts at Samsung Medical Center, including the drug prescription system, are currently electronic. After identification of cases and controls, the following clinical data were collected from the electronic medical chart system: date of diagnosis of gastric cancer, stage according to AJCC 2002, Lauren classification (intestinal, diffuse, and mixed), pathology, smoking status (never smoker, smoker, not checked), location, and Helicobacter pylori status.
Descriptive data are presented as means and proportions, as well as by frequency, for continuous data and categorical data, respectively. For univariate analysis, conditional logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk effect for gastric cancer because of matched data. Conditional multiple logistic regression analysis was used to detect the effect of statin use for gastric cancer after adjusting for aspirin use.
We investigated the statin duration-effect for gastric cancer using conditional logistic regression by evaluating the effect of the duration of any statin prescriptions examined in the following categories: 0.5 – 1.0 year, 1.0 – 1.5 years, 1.5 – 2.0 years, greater than 2.0 years. The filled prescription record for any statin during the designated time period included both in-hospital prescription and outside hospital filled prescriptions identified in the medical record system. Bonferroni’s correction was used to correct inflation type I error due to multiple testing. For all analyses, the a priori level of significance was 0.05. All data analyses were conducted using SAS software, version 9.1.3 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).
This study was reviewed and approved by the Samsung Medical Center Institutional Review Board in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Demographic factors and filled prescription data in cases with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and matched controls
Mean age, y
Statin exposure duration (year)
0 - < 0.5
0.5 – 1.0
1.0 – 1.5
1.5 – 2.0
Statin Use and the risk of gastric cancer
Effect of statin use on the incidence of gastric cancer in diabetic patients
0.183 (0.139 – 0.241)
0.418 (0.337 – 0.518)
Other lipid lowering agents
0.148 (0.073 – 0.297)
OR (95% CI)
0.211 (0.159 – 0.281)
0.608 (0.478 – 0.773)
Other lipid lowering agents
0.156 (0.073 – 0.337)
Duration of statin Use and the risk of gastric cancer
Duration of statin use and the risk of gastric cancer in diabetic patients
Variable (Statin duration)
OR (95% CI)+
0.375 (0.216 – 0.651)
0.138 (0.059 – 0.319)
0.152 (0.058 – 0.400)
0.132 (0.080 – 0.219)
Variable (Statin duration)
OR (95% CI)
0.446 (0.252 – 0.790) +
0.143 (0.061 – 0.338) +
0.178 (0.067 – 0.474) +
0.154 (0.091 – 0.260) +
0.618 (0.454 – 0.843)
Other lipid lowering agents
0.144 (0.053 – 0.392)
Statin Use and clinical features of gastric cancer
Statin use in gastric cancer patients
.1461 (adenoca vs signet ring)
Signet ring cell carcinoma
Body ~ antrum
Localized (stage I/II)
Advanced (stage III/IV)
A potential benefit of statin use has been suggested for various tumor types, including colorectal cancer [4, 11], multiple myeloma , prostate cancer, breast cancer [13, 14], hepatocellular carcinoma , and lymphoma. This matched case–control study represents the first study to indicate the existence of a strong inverse association between the risk of gastric adenocarcinoma and statin use in diabetic patients. A trend toward stronger risk reduction was seen with longer duration of statin prescriptions. The risk reduction observed with statin use was about 78%, based on multivariate analysis. No significant correlations were noted between gastric cancer risk and prescriptions for aspirin.
Emerging evidence supports the potential role of statins as anti-cancer drugs in several tumor types. Statins are synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors and are commonly used drugs for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. In our previous report, we demonstrated that a low dose lovastatin (equivalent to cardiovascular dose) induced G1 phase cell cycle arrest and cell senescence via RhoA modulation in cancer cells . In addition, we reported results from a phase II study that combined a cardiovascular dose of simvastatin and standard FOLFIRI (irinotecan, infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin) as treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer . Lastly, we recently demonstrated that the addition of 0.2 μM simvastatin (equivalent to the human cardiovascular dose) to cetuximab significantly enhanced antitumor activity in KRAS mutant colon cancer cells, but not in BRAFV600E mutant colon cancer cells .
The insulin and IGF1 signals triggered through the insulin receptors (IRs) and IGF1 receptor (IGF1R), respectively, result in activation of the phosphotidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway and protein kinase C. The IGF-1 and insulin signaling pathways are now known to play important roles in tumor cell growth that is correlated with diabetes risk and cancer . The potential anti-tumor effect of statins has been reported for multiple IGF-1-dependent malignancies [20–22]. The strong inverse correlation between statin use and colorectal cancer , hepatocellular carcinoma , and other types in patients with diabetes [6, 7] led us to survey the risk of gastric cancer in this context. Previous research has shown obesity, high body mass index, and low plasma adiponectin levels to have an association with an increased risk of gastric cancer, although the evidence is still inconclusive [23–25]. However, statins may plausibly exert an anti-tumor effect by modulating the IGF pathway in gastric cancer, especially in the subgroup of patients with diabetes. The risk of gastric cancer in statin users among diabetes patients should be prospectively confirmed for its definite role as a chemopreventive agent.
The strengths of our study would be its large patient cohort, the diagnosis of gastric cancer at a single center, statin exposure data collected from a single database, and the exact matched case–control paired analysis. Due to the importance of pathologic classification of gastric cancer, we excluded all cases which were not gastric adenocarcinoma or signet ring cell carcinoma. The statin exposure data were retrieved from our electronic medical record system, which comprises all inpatient and outpatient clinics. Hence, the prescription database is relatively accurate. Nevertheless, our study is limited by the observational retrospective nature of its study design. Other tentative risk factors for gastric adenocarcinoma, such as BMI, adenopectin levels, or dietary factors, were not available for correlative analyses. The adjusted odds ratio for gastric cancer was relatively low, conferring about a 70 ~ 80% risk reduction by statin use in diabetic patients in our study. This odds ratio is lower than those reported for other cancer types, which ranged from 20 – 60% risk reduction [4, 8, 11]. The retrospective nature of the analysis also could present potential confounders such as prescription bias for statins in the gastric cancer patient cohort. However, the matched case–control pairs were identified from a large patient pool with diabetes, which may minimize this type of bias, especially by eliminating those cases with diabetes entry after the index date for gastric cancer. Another potential bias for our observations would be the inherent bias from our patient population, all of whom visited a larger tertiary hospital in Korea instead of a private clinic for diabetes control. This patient pool may be more attentive to their health condition than others who visited the tertiary hospital for gastric cancer treatment, and thus might have led to an increased detection rate for statin use in diabetes group. Hence, our analysis should be cross-validated in other hospital settings. In addition, our observation that lower incidence of gastric cancer in statin users might be confounded by LDL cholesterol. Several epidemiological studies have reported that low plasma LDL cholesterol levels are associated with an increased risk of cancer [26–29]. Therefore, patients who were prescribed of statins might have higher LDL cholesterol level, which might be associated with decreased cancer risk.
Another limitation of our study is that due to retrospective nature of the study, the interval of endoscopy was not controlled. In Korea and Japan, endoscopy is recommended as a nationwide cancer screening program after age of 40. In this particular cohort, the median time for endoscopy interval (2 years) and mean duration between the date of entry into the diabetes cohort and gastric cancer index (673 days) are nearly the same, suggesting that the possibility of preexisting cancer at the time of diabetes cohort registry cannot be excluded. There was no difference in endoscopy intervals between statin user and non-statin user in this cohort. In addition, the drug use in this study was defined as any periods before diagnosis of gastric cancer and therefore any periods after the diagnosis was classified as non-use of statins. Our definition of use of statins presumes that gastric cancer does not occur after the use of statin. Hence, longer duration of use of statins itself was related with less chance of being diagnosed with gastric cancer. Thus, testing the duration-effect relationship may not mean more than the overall effect of statin use on the risk of gastric cancer. To further validate the impact of duration of statin use on gastric cancer incidence would be to validate the “exact case control study” using statins and their effect on cardiovascular disease or coronary artery disease .
Statin use was not significantly associated with other variables such as grade of differentiation, smoking status, location, or the presence of Helicobacter pylori. However, gastric cancer found in statin users had an increased likelihood for localized disease (P = 0.040). One of the conceivable reasons for this type of finding would be that a statin user might have been more compliant for gastroscopy screening, which led to early detection. In addition, the survival of gastric cancer patients who had used statins for more than 6 months demonstrated favorable survival (5-year OS, 89.3% vs. 73.0%; statin user vscpg non-user; P=0.0873, Figure 1) when compared with non-statin users. The impact of statin use on survival of gastric cancer needs to be externally validated in order to draw a more definitive conclusion.
In this study, we conducted a large exact-matched case–control study in patients with diabetes. We demonstrated that statin use may considerably reduce the risk of gastric adenocarcinoma. Although external validation is needed, a lower incidence of gastric cancer was evident in statin users. The anti-tumor effect of simvastatin as a chemopreventive agent and/or anti-tumor agent will be evaluated through ongoing trials (i.e., NCT# 00944463, NCT# 01099085).
This study was supported by a grant of the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (A102166).
- Goldstein JL, Brown MS: Regulation of the mevalonate pathway. Nature. 1990, 343 (6257): 425-430. 10.1038/343425a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Casey PJ: Protein lipidation in cell signaling. Science (New York, NY. 1995, 268 (5208): 221-225. 10.1126/science.7716512.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rando RR: Chemical biology of isoprenylation/methylation. Biochem Soc Trans. 1996, 24 (3): 682-687.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Poynter JN, Gruber SB, Higgins PD, Almog R, Bonner JD, Rennert HS, Low M, Greenson JK, Rennert G: Statins and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352 (21): 2184-2192. 10.1056/NEJMoa043792.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C: Unintended effects of statins in men and women in England and Wales: population based cohort study using the QResearch database. BMJ. 2010, 340: c2197-10.1136/bmj.c2197.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yang X, So WY, Ma RC, Ko GT, Kong AP, Zhao H, Luk AO, Lam CW, Ho CS, Tong PC, et al: Low LDL cholesterol, albuminuria, and statins for the risk of cancer in type 2 diabetes: the Hong Kong diabetes registry. Diabetes Care. 2009, 32 (10): 1826-1832. 10.2337/dc09-0725.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yang X, Zhao H, Sui Y, Ma RC, So WY, Ko GT, Kong AP, Ozaki R, Yeung CY, Xu G, et al: Additive interaction between the renin-angiotensin system and lipid metabolism for cancer in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2009, 58 (7): 1518-1525. 10.2337/db09-0105.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- El-Serag HB, Johnson ML, Hachem C, Morgana RO: Statins are associated with a reduced risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in a large cohort of patients with diabetes. Gastroenterology. 2009, 136 (5): 1601-1608. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.01.053.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kuoppala J, Lamminpaa A, Pukkala E: Statins and cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2008, 44 (15): 2122-2132. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.06.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vinogradova Y, Coupland C, Hippisley-Cox J: Exposure to statins and risk of common cancers: a series of nested case–control studies. BMC Cancer. 2011, 11: 409-10.1186/1471-2407-11-409.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hachem C, Morgan R, Johnson M, Kuebeler M, El-Serag H: Statins and the risk of colorectal carcinoma: a nested case–control study in veterans with diabetes. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009, 104 (5): 1241-1248. 10.1038/ajg.2009.64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Landgren O, Zhang Y, Zahm SH, Inskip P, Zheng T, Baris D: Risk of multiple myeloma following medication use and medical conditions: a case–control study in Connecticut women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006, 15 (12): 2342-2347. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0097.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boudreau DM, Gardner JS, Malone KE, Heckbert SR, Blough DK, Daling JR: The association between 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl conenzyme A inhibitor use and breast carcinoma risk among postmenopausal women: a case–control study. Cancer. 2004, 100 (11): 2308-2316. 10.1002/cncr.20271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eliassen AH, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Willett WC, Hankinson SE: Serum lipids, lipid-lowering drugs, and the risk of breast cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2005, 165 (19): 2264-2271. 10.1001/archinte.165.19.2264.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nowakowski GS, Maurer MJ, Habermann TM, Ansell SM, Macon WR, Ristow KM, Allmer C, Slager SL, Witzig TE, Cerhan JR: Statin use and prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma in the rituximab era. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28 (3): 412-417. 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4245.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee J, Lee I, Park C, Kang WK: Lovastatin-induced RhoA modulation and its effect on senescence in prostate cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 339 (3): 748-754. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.11.075.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee J, Jung KH, Park YS, Ahn JB, Shin SJ, Im SA, Shin DB, Kim TW, Lee N, Oh Do Y, et al: Simvastatin plus irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal patients: a multicenter phase II study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009, 64 (4): 657-663. 10.1007/s00280-008-0913-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee J, Lee I, Han B, Park JO, Jang J, Park C, Kang WK: Effect of simvastatin on cetuximab resistance in human colorectal cancer with KRAS mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011, 103 (8): 674-688. 10.1093/jnci/djr070.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pollak M: Insulin and insulin-like growth factor signalling in neoplasia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008, 8 (12): 915-928. 10.1038/nrc2536.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carlberg M, Dricu A, Blegen H, Wang M, Hjertman M, Zickert P, Hoog A, Larsson O: Mevalonic acid is limiting for N-linked glycosylation and translocation of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor to the cell surface. Evidence for a new link between 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme a reductase and cell growth. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271 (29): 17453-17462. 10.1074/jbc.271.29.17453.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Girnita L, Wang M, Xie Y, Nilsson G, Dricu A, Wejde J, Larsson O: Inhibition of N-linked glycosylation down-regulates insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor at the cell surface and kills Ewing's sarcoma cells: therapeutic implications. Anticancer Drug Des. 2000, 15 (1): 67-72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sekine Y, Furuya Y, Nishii M, Koike H, Matsui H, Suzuki K: Simvastatin inhibits the proliferation of human prostate cancer PC-3 cells via down-regulation of the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008, 372 (2): 356-361. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.05.043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wolk A, Gridley G, Svensson M, Nyren O, McLaughlin JK, Fraumeni JF, Adam HO: A prospective study of obesity and cancer risk (Sweden). Cancer Causes Control. 2001, 12 (1): 13-21. 10.1023/A:1008995217664.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Larsson SWA: Epidemiology of obesity and diabetes: prevalence and trends Obesity and Diabetes. 2006, Boston: Humana PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ishikawa M, Kitayama J, Kazama S, Hiramatsu T, Hatano K, Nagawa H: Plasma adiponectin and gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (2 Pt 1): 466-472.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strasak AM, Pfeiffer RM, Brant LJ, Rapp K, Hilbe W, Oberaigner W, Lang S, Borena W, Concin H, Diem G, et al: Time-dependent association of total serum cholesterol and cancer incidence in a cohort of 172,210 men and women: a prospective 19-year follow-up study. Ann Oncol. 2009, 20 (6): 1113-1120. 10.1093/annonc/mdn736.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sherwin RW, Wentworth DN, Cutler JA, Hulley SB, Kuller LH, Stamler J: Serum cholesterol levels and cancer mortality in 361,662 men screened for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. JAMA. 1987, 257 (7): 943-948. 10.1001/jama.1987.03390070063024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neaton JD, Blackburn H, Jacobs D, Kuller L, Lee DJ, Sherwin R, Shih J, Stamler J, Wentworth D: Serum cholesterol level and mortality findings for men screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group. Arch Intern Med. 1992, 152 (7): 1490-1500. 10.1001/archinte.1992.00400190110021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benn M, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Stender S, Frikke-Schmidt R, Nordestgaard BG: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the risk of cancer: a mendelian randomization study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011, 103 (6): 508-519. 10.1093/jnci/djr008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang XL, Ma RC, So WY, Kong AP, Xu G, Chan JC: Addressing different biases in analysing drug use on cancer risk in diabetes in non-clinical trial settings–what, why and how?. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012, 14 (7): 579-585. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01551.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://0-www.biomedcentral.com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1471-2407/12/596/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.