Skip to main content

Table 2 Variables, instruments and assessment times

From: Using a state cancer registry to recruit young breast cancer survivors and high-risk relatives: protocol of a randomized trial testing the efficacy of a targeted versus a tailored intervention to increase breast cancer screening

Concepts/variables

Instruments

Survivor

High-risk relative

Baseline

Follow up

Baseline

Follow up

Knowledge/Attitude

     

Perceived breast cancer risk

Perceived breast cancer risk [11, 20]

  

Knowledge of breast cancer risk factors

Breast cancer risk factor knowledge index [11, 21]

Knowledge of breast cancer genetics

Knowledge of breast cancer gene inheritance [22]

Perceived facilitators vs. barriers of mammography screening

Decisional balance scale for mammography [23, 24]

Subjective norms

     

Perceived family expectations about breast cancer screening

Adapted from Ajzen et al. [14]

Motivation to comply with family members’ expectations

Adapted from Ajzen et al. [14]

Family support

     

Perceived family support for breast cancer screening

Social support for breast cancer screening [25]

PERCEIVED CONTROL

     

Self-efficacy in utilizing breast cancer screening services

Self-efficacy for mammography, CBE, cancer genetic services [14]

Intention

     

Intention to pursue mammogram, CBE, genetic counseling (when applicable)

Intention to pursue mammography, CBE, and cancer genetic services (when applicable) [14]

Behavior

     

Current screening practices

Behavioral risk factors surveillance system [24]

Other

     

Demographics/personal and family history

Behavioral risk factors surveillance system [26]

 

 

Breast cancer risk (Gail model)

Breast cancer risk assessment tool [27]

  

Breast cancer risk (Claus model)

Claus breast cancer risk tables [13]

    

Evaluation of the Acceptability of the Intervention

TBD by researchers