- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
L-Arginine supplementation inhibits the growth of breast cancer by enhancing innate and adaptive immune responses mediated by suppression of MDSCs in vivo
© The Author(s). 2016
- Received: 12 October 2015
- Accepted: 20 May 2016
- Published: 1 June 2016
L-Arg is involved in many biological activities, including the activation of T cells. In breast cancer patients, L-Arg is depleted by nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2) and arginase 1 (ARG-1) produced by myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Our aim was to test whether L-Arg supplementation could enhance antitumor immune response and improve survivorship in a rodent model of mammary tumor.
Tumor volumes in control and L-Arg treated 4 T1 tumor bearing (TB) BALB/c mice were measured and survival rates were recorded. The percentages of MDSCs, dendritic cells (DCs), regulatory T cells (Tregs), macrophages, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells were examined by flow cytometry. Additionally, levels of IL-10, TNF-α, and IFN-γ were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and nitric oxide (NO) levels were measured by the Griess reaction. IFN-γ, T-bet, Granzyme B, ARG-1 and iNOS mRNA levels were examined by real-time RT-PCR.
L-Arg treatment inhibited tumor growth and prolonged the survival time of 4 T1 TB mice. The frequency of MDSCs was significantly suppressed in L-Arg treated TB mice. In contrast, the numbers and function of macrophages, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells were significantly enhanced. The IFN-γ, TNF-α, NO levels in splenocytes supernatant, as well as iNOS, IFN-γ, Granzyme B mRNA levels in splenocytes and tumor blocks were significantly increased. The ARG-1 mRNA level in tumor blocks, the frequency of Tregs, and IL-10 level were not affected.
L-Arg supplementation significantly inhibited tumor growth and prolonged the survival time of 4 T1 TB mice, which was associated with the reduction of MDSCs, and enhanced innate and adaptive immune responses.
- Breast cancer
- Tumor immunity
Despite advances in multimodal therapies, breast cancer remains a significant problem that causes deaths in women worldwide. Although the incidence and mortality vary by geographical region, the overall incidence of breast cancer is increasing . Breast cancer is often associated with immune suppression in humans and L-arginine (L-Arg) depletion, an occurrence which can be effectively modeled in tumor-bearing (TB) mice. Therefore, it is necessary to identify new therapeutic targets for the breast cancer, especially for the regulation of immune responses.
L-Arg is an essential amino acid for infants and young children but a conditionally essential amino acid for adults. It can be metabolized into nitric oxide (NO) and L-citrulline by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) or into urea and L-ornithine by ARG-1 . NO modulates different cancer-related events. However, several lines of research have indicated that NO may have dual effects in cancer . L-Arg plays a central role in several biologic systems, including the activation of T cell function . L-Arg depletion by myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), which produce arginase 1 (ARG-1) and NO synthase 2 (NOS2), is observed in cancer patients [2, 5–7]. This subset of myelomonocytic cells promotes tumor growth and metastasis, which are highly efficient at suppressing activated T cells, leading to the impairment of general and tumor-specific adaptive immune responses [2, 8]. Activated T cells cultured in a medium without L-Arg, or cocultured with ARG-1 producing MDSCs isolated from tumors, proliferate at a decreased rate, express lower levels of the T cell receptor CD3 chain, and produce reduced levels of cytokines [6, 9, 10]. Such impaired T cell functions can be reversed by the enteral or parenteral supplementation of L-Arg .
Considering that (1) L-Arg level is decreased in tumor bearing patients and mice , (2) anti-tumor T cell immunity is usually suppressed, whereas MDSCs which mediate tumor escape are always enhanced in the tumor bearers, and (3) L-Arg depletion by MDSCs leads to the depression of T cells [7, 13], we hypothesized that L-Arg supplementation would inhibit tumor growth and improve survival. Murine models have been established to study breast cancer focusing on the specific clinical questions. In order to test this hypothesis, we supplemented the breast cancer-bearing BALB/c mice with L-Arg and monitored the host’s anti-tumor immune responses. Results showed that supplementation with L-Arg prolonged survival time of the host and inhibited tumor growth. This effect is associated with enhanced innate and adaptive immune responses. The results suggest that L-Arg supplementation may be a viable preventative and/or adjunctive treatment for the inhibition of breast cancer development.
Cell line and tumor implantation
The 4 T1 mouse mammary carcinoma cell line lacks the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and metastasizes to other organs in a way similar to what is observed in naturally occurring breast cancer in humans , thus we selected 4 T1 mouse mammary carcinoma cell line to establish the breast cancer model. 4 T1 cell line was obtained from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). All animal experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of China Medical University. Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1 % penicillin-streptomycin, at 37 °C and 5 % CO2 in a 95 % humidified incubator. L-Arg was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and diluted to 150 mg/ml with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.0. Female, 6–8-week-old BABL/c mice were purchased from Academia Sinica Shanghai Experimental Animal Center (Shanghai, China). Mice were housed under controlled light and temperature conditions and randomly assigned to experimental and control groups of ten mice each. 4 T1 mouse mammary carcinoma cells (1 × 105) were injected subcutaneously into the shaved flanks of mice. L-Arg treatment was then initiated on day 7 post-inoculation when the diameter of the tumor was palpable. For the dose selection of L-Arg used in the current study, we examined three different doses L-Arg (2.5 g/kg, 1.5 g/kg and 0.5 g/kg) supplementation on the tumor volume based on published literature [15, 16], and then 1.5 g/kg L-Arg was chosen to perform the following studies. Mice in the experimental group were treated for 20 consecutive days via oral administration of L-Arg (1.5 g/kg), whereas the control group received equal amounts of PBS once a day. To explore the role of NO, some mice were supplied with water with 1 % aminoguanidine (AG), an NOS inhibitor. Tumor growth was monitored every three days by measuring the tumor length (L) and width (W) using calipers and calculating the tumor size according to the following formula: Tumor volume (mm3) =1⁄2 × long diameter × short diameter squared. At the end of the treatment (day 28 post inoculation), three animals of each group were euthanized with ether. Tumor mass, lymph nodes, and spleens were removed for further analysis.
Spleens and lymph nodes from 4 T1 TB BALB/c mice were dissected and homogenized to produce a single cell suspension. After red blood cells were lysed, the cells were washed with PBS (300 × g for 7 min) and adjusted to 1 × 107/ml with RPMI-1640. Dendritic cells (DCs) were stained with FITC-anti-CD11c (clone HL3, BD Biosciences), PE-anti-CD11b (clone M1/70, BD Biosciences), PerCP-anti- CD45R⁄ B220 (clone RA3-6B2, BD Biosciences) and APC-MHC II (clone M5/114.15.2, eBioscience). To assess regulatory T cells (Tregs), FITC-anti-CD4 (clone H129.19, BD Biosciences) and PE-anti-CD25 antibodies (clone PC61, BD Biosciences) were added to spleen cells, and resuspended in 100 μl of PBS supplemented with 3 % FCS for surface staining. Then, the cells were fixed and permeabilized, and intracytoplasmic staining was performed using APC-anti-Foxp3 (clone FJK16s, eBioscience) antibody. For assessing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, single cell suspensions from spleens and lymph nodes were stained with FITC-anti-CD3e (clone 145-2C11, BD Biosciences), PE-anti-CD4 (clone H129.19, BD Biosciences) and PerCp-anti-CD8α (clone 53–6.7, BD Biosciences). For the staining of macrophages and MDSCs, PerCP cy5.5-anti-F4/80 (clone BM8, ebiosciences), FITC-anti-CD11b (clone M1/70, BD Biosciences), and APC-anti-Gr-1 (clone RB6-8C5, BD Biosciences) were added into the 100 μl single splenocyte suspension and incubated for 30 min at 4 °C.
Intracellular cytokine staining assays were performed as described elsewhere . Briefly, cells isolated from spleens were stimulated with PMA (50 ng/ml), ionomycin (1 μg/ml), and brefeldin (Sigma) in order to induce IFN-γ production. LPS (1 μg/ml) and GolgiPlugô were used to induce IL-12 production. Following stimulation, the cells were incubated for 5 h in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10 % FBS at 37 °C. Cells were collected and washed twice followed by surface staining as described above. The cells were then fixed and permeabilized with Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions and stained intracellularly with PE-anti-IFN-γ (clone XMG 1.2, BD Biosciences) and PE-anti-IL-12p40/70 (clone C15.6, BD Biosciences) or with corresponding isotope control antibodies for 30 min in permeabilization buffer (BD Biosciences). After washing twice in permeabilization buffer, the cells were resuspended in PBS.
For tumor staining and ROS measurement, tumors were removed from each mouse at the end of treatment and minced into small pieces and digested with 500 U/ml collagenase (type IV, Sigma) for 1 h at 37 °C with agitation. The resultant cells were passed through nylon mesh to remove debris, and viable cells were washed with PBS with 2 % FBS. Intracellular ROS generation was assessed using 2’,7,-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA , Sigma). Briefly, 1 × 106 cells were plated on the 6-well plates and incubated with DCFH-DA (10 mmol/L) for 30 min at 37°C oC and stained with corresponding antibodies as described above. After washing twice with PBS, the cells were resuspended in PBS containing 5 % FCS.
Data were acquired using FACS Calibur (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) and analyzed using FlowJo v7.6.2 (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
Cytokine assays by ELISA and NO assay by Griess reaction
Splenocytes harvested from each group of mice were cultured for 48 h followed by collection of the supernatants. Levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-10 were determined with a corresponding ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To determine NO production, concentrations of NO2 − in cell supernatants were measured by the Griess reaction . Briefly, 100 μl of the supernatant was incubated with 100 μl of Griess reagent [equal volumes of 1 % (w/v) sulfanilamide (Wako, Osaka, Japan) and 0.1 % (w/v) N-1-naphtyl ethylenediamine dihydrochloride (Wako) in 2.5 % (w/v) H3PO4] for 10 min at room temperature, and NO2 − concentration was determined by measuring the optical density at 550 nm (A550) in reference to the A550 of standard NaNO2 solution.
RNA isolation and real-time RT-PCR
Primer sequences for RT-PCR
Survival analysis was tested by the Kaplan–Meyer method. Results were expressed as the mean value ± SD and interpreted by Student’s t-test. Differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05.
L-Arg supplementation slows the growth of 4 T1 breast carcinoma cells and prolongs survival
L-Arg suppresses the MDSCs from spleen and tumor
L-Arg supplementation promotes Gr-1+CD11b−F4/80+ macrophages but suppresses Gr-1+CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages
L-Arg promotes the differentiation and activation the of DCs in 4 T1 TB mice
L-Arg promotes Th1 immune responses leading to inhibition of cancer development
L-Arg has no effect on the Tregs in 4 T1 TB mice
Mouse models are important tools to investigate the immune response and immunotherapeutic outcomes in cancer. In some experimental tumor models, L-Arg increases the latency period and survival rate, reduces tumor size and incidence, shortens the time of tumor regression, and inhibits tumor growth compared with other dietary interference or no dietary supplementation [20–22]. Dietary supplementation with L-Arg in patients with breast cancer significantly enhances host defenses [23, 24], and therefore may have a beneficial therapeutic role. In a related study, supplement of L-Arg significantly reduced the incidence of colorectal cancer due to a nonspecific stimulation of the host immune system . In the present study, we supplemented 4 T1 TB mice with L-Arg and monitored anti-tumor immune responses. The results revealed that L-Arg prolonged survival time by inhibiting tumor growth. This was associated with the suppression of MDSCs and enhanced innate and adaptive immune responses. This suggests that L-Arg might be used as an adjuvant for breast cancer treatment.
MDSCs, typically positive for both CD11b and Gr1 in mice, are a population of immature myeloid cells defined by their suppressive actions on T cells, DCs, and natural killer cells. MDSCs can suppress T cell immune function via constitutive production of ARG-1, an enzyme responsible for significant L-Arg depletion [10, 26]. In addition to inhibiting T cells activation, MDSCs also impact anti-tumor immunity by perturbing innate immunity through their interactions with macrophages, NK cells, and NK T cells [27, 28]. Both MDSCs and T cells require L-Arg for protein synthesis. MDSCs produce high levels of intracellular arginase requiring them to import excess arginine through their CAT-2B transporter [29, 30]. As a result, they deplete L-Arg and limit L-Arg availability to T cells in the tumor microenvironment. Without L-Arg, naïve T cells in TB individuals cannot efficiently traffic to lymph nodes or tumor sites. MDSCs were found to infiltrate into tumors and promote tumor angiogenesis by producing high levels of MMP9 and by directly incorporating into tumor endothelium . Hence, as a therapeutic target, down-regulation of MDSCs frequencies and/or abrogation of their immunosuppressive functions delay the tumor growth and prolong the survival both in animal models and in cancer patients [32–34]. Regulation of MDSCs includes the prevention of generation from bone marrow precursor cells and the stimulation of MDSCs differentiation towards mature DCs and macrophages. Therapeutic interventions targeting MDSCs may not only enhance the host immune system but also inhibit tumor invasion and metastasis . In the present study, the frequencies of MDSCs were significantly suppressed in the 4 T1 TB mice after supplementation with L-Arg, and consistently, anti-tumor immunity was enhanced. Our results showed that L-Arg supplementation enhanced the anti-tumor immunity by suppressing the number of MDSCs in 4 T1 TB mice. This is in agreement with the recent report that L-Arg depletion blunted antitumor T-cell responses by inducing MDSCs . Although the mechanism remains unclear, such inverse correlation between L-Arg and MDSCs may be mediated by the kinase GCN2, a key mediator of the effects induced by amino acid starvation . In addition, several possible factors regulating MDSCs including VEGF, S100A8/A9, GM-CSF, and G-CSF may be involved in the downregulation of MDSCs by L-Arg supplementation. Dietary L-Arg was reported to decrease plasma VEGF . More experiments are required to identify the key molecules to bridge the MDSCs and L-Arg in the breast cancer model in the future.
Macrophages, which are pivotal regulators in homeostatic tissue and tumor microenvironments, play dual roles during the progression of cancer. In one role, they activate and present tumor antigens to T cells, which are then activated to kill tumor cells . At the same time, they release high levels of NO and ROS to kill tumor cells [38, 39]. On the other hand, as the immune surveillance is not sufficient anymore to prevent the occurrence of cancer, tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) contributes to tumor progression [40, 41]. Many observations indicate that TAM (Gr-1+ CD11b+ F4/80+) promote tumor progression and metastasis [42, 43]. In our study, flow cytometric analysis of splenic F4/80+ macrophages revealed that more than 90 % of the Gr-1+ cells had a CD11b+F4/80+ macrophage phenotype, which also was considered as a subset of MDSCs . L-Arg treatment significantly decreased this population but elevated the frequency of CD11b−F4/80+ macrophages. In our study, L-Arg significantly elevated the mRNA level of iNOS, but not ARG-1, which was consistent with the higher level of NO. An earlier study showed that L-Arg could block the formation and development of colorectal tumors, and this effect might be related to the increased serum NO concentration and decreased ornithine decarboxylase activity . Our results also indicated that L-Arg supplementation could significantly elevate the NO level in 4 T1 TB mice which was consistent with the increased level of CD11b−F4/80+ macrophages. However, NO was reported to have both deleterious and protective effects in the breast cancer [38, 45, 46]. Therefore, we further evaluated the role of NO in breast cancer by supplementation of an NOS inhibitor, aminoguanidine (AG) into the 4 T1 TB mice with L-Arg supplementation (L-Arg + AG). The results showed that L-Arg and L-Arg + AG treatment had a comparable suppressive effect on tumor tissue weight (data not shown), which reflects the complexity of NO in breast cancer. Considering the divergent cell sources of NO including macrophages , T cells , MDSCs , tumor cells , we speculate that the distinct sources and different bioavailability levels of NO may account for the inconsistent roles of NO in the tumor models. In addition, NO may serve as one but not the only one (such as IFN-γ, CTL) protective effector in the tumor bearing mice supplemented with L-Arg. Thus the exact role of NO in breast cancer needs to be explored in the future.
DCs play a pivotal role in bridging innate and adaptive immune responses. MDSCs decrease DC maturation, as well as the ability to take up antigen, migrate, and induce IFN-γ production in T cells . In this study, immature DCs in TB mice were increased compared to the control group. A corroborating study showed that dietary supplementation with L-Arg enhanced T cell mediated immune function in healthy animals and human beings [52, 53]. We also found that L-Arg could promote the differentiation and activation of DCs in the spleen, which was associated with the initiation of the anti-tumor immune responses in TB mice. Our data showed that L-Arg treatment significantly increased the frequencies of mDCs and pDCs. IL-12 increases the capabilities of professional APCs in the tumor stromal and activates CD8+ T cells to detect antigen cross-presentation [54, 55]. In the 4 T1 model, IL-12 stimulates MDSCs to develop into mature myeloid cells. MDSCs obtained from tumors and spleens of tumor bearing mice treated with IL-12 up-regulated the surface markers of macrophages (F4/80 and MHC II) and DCs (CD80 and CD86) suggesting differentiation into more mature, less immunosuppressive forms. The spleens obtained from tumor-bearing mice also had up-regulation of many dendritic cell and macrophage maturation markers such as CD80, CD86, F4/80 and MHCII . At the same time, high levels of IL-12 synthesized by mature DCs enhance both innate and acquired immunity [57, 58]. In this experiment, we found expression of MHC II and secretion of IL-12 by DCs were both significantly increased by L-Arg treatment.
L-Arg deprivation induces T cell hyporesponsiveness, as defined by profound reduction of T cell proliferation and reduced CD3ζ chain expression [6, 9]. Tumor-infiltrating CTLs have antitumor activity as judged by their favorable effect on patients’ survival and could potentially be exploited in the treatment of breast cancer . However, T cells show anergy as both antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are tolerant to tumors. The mechanisms of CD8+ T cell tolerance to tumors include MDSCs  and Tregs . MDSCs are also detected in tumor infiltrates and inhibit effector phase lytic functions of CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes . A recent study showed that treatment of TB mice with 5-fluorouracil led to a major depletion of MDSCs in vivo but increased IFN-γ production by tumor-specific CD8+ T cells infiltrating the tumor and promoted T cell dependent antitumor responses in vivo . These results indicated that therapy targeting MDSCs could be an effective method of cancer treatment. Our results demonstrated that L-Arg supplementation could reverse the immunosuppresive effects of MDSCs in 4 T1 TB mice as CD8+ T cells were significantly elevated within tumors. Undoubtedly, granzyme B is involved in an important pathway for CTL/NK cells-induced apoptosis , and L-Arg significantly elevated the mRNA level of granzyme B in tumor. Though CD4+ T cells producing IFN-γ was not increased, supplementation of TB mice with L-Arg elevate Th1 cells transcription factor T-bet, and also improved IFN-γ production. As a pro-inflammatory cytokine, IFN-γ induced surface expression of PD-L1 in breast cancer cells to induce the apoptosis of cancer cells .
In breast cancers, the percentage of Tregs, as assessed by Foxp3 positivity, increases in parallel with the disease stage [65, 66], indicating that the presence of Tregs promotes tumor progression through immunosuppression. IL-10 has been shown to modulate apoptosis and suppress angiogenesis during tumor regression [67, 68]. Here, our results showed that the level of Tregs transcription factor Foxp3 was significantly reduced upon L-Arg treatment.
In summary, L-Arg is an essential amino acid for promoting T cell function. However, the depletion of L-Arg by MDSCs in breast cancer patients or TB mice greatly reduces the anti-tumor immune responses. L-Arg supplementation in breast cancer bearing mice significantly decreased MDSCs as well as the ROS expression levels. This decrease was associated with enhanced innate and adaptive immune responses targeting tumors of the 4 T1 TB mice.
Our results suggest that L-Arg supplementation may represent an effective adjunct therapy of breast cancer therapy to overcome immunosuppression mediated both by MDSCs and tumor cells to achieve better therapeutic effects in cancer patients.
AG, aminoguanidine; ARG-1, arginase 1; CT, cycle threshold; CTLs, cytotoxic T lymphocytes; DCs, dendritic cells; ER, estrogen receptor; FBS, fetal bovine serum; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; L, length; L-Arg, L-arginine; MDSCs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells; TB, tumor bearing; NO, nitric oxide; NOS2, nitric oxide synthase 2; Tregs, regulatory T cells; W, width
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30950009) and Liaoning Province Science and Technology Foundation (2009412001-7). We are grateful to all other staff in the College of Animal Science and Technology.
Availability of data and materials
Data and materials are included in the manuscript.
YC conceived the study and drafted the manuscript. YF conducted the experiments of flow cytometry. YZ and XZ performed the statistical analysis. FJ participated in the design, coordination of the study as well as statistical evaluation. All authors proofread the manuscript critically, and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All animal experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of China Medical University.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Barron JJ, Quimbo R, Nikam PT, Amonkar MM. Assessing the economic burden of breast cancer in a US managed care population. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;2:367–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bronte V, Zanovello P. Regulation of immune responses by L-arginine metabolism. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;8:641–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kudo S, Nagasaki Y. A novel nitric oxide-based anticancer therapeutics by macrophage-targeted poly(l-arginine)-based nanoparticles. J Control Release. 2015;217:256–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gad MZ. Anti-aging effects of L-arginine. J Adv Res. 2010;3:169–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez PC, Quiceno DG, Ochoa AC. L-arginine availability regulates T-lymphocyte cell-cycle progression. Blood. 2007;4:1568–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zea AH, Rodriguez PC, Atkins MB, Hernandez C, Signoretti S, Zabaleta J, et al. Arginase-producing myeloid suppressor cells in renal cell carcinoma patients: a mechanism of tumor evasion. Cancer Res. 2005;8:3044–8.Google Scholar
- Fletcher M, Ramirez ME, Sierra RA, Raber P, Thevenot P, Al-Khami AA, et al. l-Arginine depletion blunts antitumor T-cell responses by inducing myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Res. 2015;75(2):275–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez PC, Ochoa AC. Arginine regulation by myeloid derived suppressor cells and tolerance in cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives. Immunol Rev. 2008;222:180–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez PC, Zea AH, Culotta KS, Zabaleta J, Ochoa JB, Ochoa AC. Regulation of T cell receptor CD3zeta chain expression by L-arginine. J Biol Chem. 2002;24:21123–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez PC, Quiceno DG, Zabaleta J, Ortiz B, Zea AH, Piazuelo MB, et al. Arginase I production in the tumor microenvironment by mature myeloid cells inhibits T-cell receptor expression and antigen-specific T-cell responses. Cancer Res. 2004;16:5839–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barbul A. Arginine and immune function. Nutrition. 1990;1:53–8. discussion 59-62.Google Scholar
- Geng D, Sun D, Zhang L, Zhang W. The therapy of gefitinib towards breast cancer partially through reversing breast cancer biomarker arginine. Afr Health Sci. 2015;2:594–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cimen Bozkus C, Elzey BD, Crist SA, Ellies LG, Ratliff TL. Expression of Cationic Amino Acid Transporter 2 Is Required for Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell-Mediated Control of T Cell Immunity. J Immunol. 2015;11:5237–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang X, Belosay A, Du M, Fan TM, Turner RT, Iwaniec UT, et al. Estradiol increases ER-negative breast cancer metastasis in an experimental model. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2013;6:711–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Breuillard C, Darquy S, Curis E, Neveux N, Garnier JP, Cynober L, et al. Effects of a diabetes-specific enteral nutrition on nutritional and immune status of diabetic, obese, and endotoxemic rats: interest of a graded arginine supply. Crit Care Med. 2012;8:2423–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zheng L, Pan Y, Feng Y, Cui L, Cao Y. L-Arginine supplementation in mice enhances NO production in spleen cells and inhibits Plasmodium yoelii transmission in mosquitoes. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:326.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bharhani MS, Chiu B, Na KS, Inman RD. Activation of invariant NKT cells confers protection against Chlamydia trachomatis-induced arthritis. Int Immunol. 2009;7:859–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cao Y-M, Tsuboi T, Torii M. Nitric oxide inhibits the development of Plasmodium yoelii gametocytes into gametes. Parasitol Int. 1998;2:157–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Olkhanud PB, Damdinsuren B, Bodogai M, Gress RE, Sen R, Wejksza K, et al. Tumor-evoked regulatory B cells promote breast cancer metastasis by converting resting CD4(+) T cells to T-regulatory cells. Cancer Res. 2011;10:3505–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takeda Y, Tominaga T, Tei N, Kitamura M, Taga S. Inhibitory effect of L-arginine on growth of rat mammary tumors induced by 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene. Cancer Res. 1975;9:2390–3.Google Scholar
- Tachibana K, Mukai K, Hiraoka I, Moriguchi S, Takama S, Kishino Y. Evaluation of the effect of arginine-enriched amino acid solution on tumor growth. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1985;4:428–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reynolds JV, Daly JM, Shou J, Sigal R, Ziegler MM, Naji A. Immunologic effects of arginine supplementation in tumor-bearing and non-tumor-bearing hosts. Ann Surg. 1990;2:202–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brittenden J, Park KG, Heys SD, Ross C, Ashby J, Ah-See A, et al. L-arginine stimulates host defenses in patients with breast cancer. Surgery. 1994;2:205–12.Google Scholar
- Brittenden J, Heys SD, Ross J, Park KG, Eremin O. Natural cytotoxicity in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: effects of L-arginine supplementation. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1994;4:467–72.Google Scholar
- Ma Q, Hoper M, Anderson N, Rowlands BJ. Effect of supplemental L-arginine in a chemical-induced model of colorectal cancer. World J Surg. 1996;8:1087–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bronte V, Serafini P, De Santo C, Marigo I, Tosello V, Mazzoni A, et al. IL-4-induced arginase 1 suppresses alloreactive T cells in tumor-bearing mice. J Immunol. 2003;1:270–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Sinha P. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: linking inflammation and cancer. J Immunol. 2009;8:4499–506.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: more mechanisms for inhibiting antitumor immunity. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2010;10:1593–600.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mussai F, Egan S, Higginbotham-Jones J, Perry T, Beggs A, Odintsova E, et al. Arginine dependence of acute myeloid leukemia blast proliferation: a novel therapeutic target. Blood. 2015;15:2386–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Raber P, Ochoa AC, Rodriguez PC. Metabolism of L-arginine by myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer: mechanisms of T cell suppression and therapeutic perspectives. Immunol Invest. 2012;41(6-7):614–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yang L, DeBusk LM, Fukuda K, Fingleton B, Green-Jarvis B, Shyr Y, et al. Expansion of myeloid immune suppressor Gr + CD11b + cells in tumor-bearing host directly promotes tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Cell. 2004;4:409–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Filipazzi P, Huber V, Rivoltini L. Phenotype, function and clinical implications of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012;2:255–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilcox RA. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: therapeutic modulation in cancer. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2012;4:838–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Montero AJ, Diaz-Montero CM, Kyriakopoulos CE, Bronte V, Mandruzzato S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer patients: a clinical perspective. J Immunother. 2012;2:107–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang L, Huang J, Ren X, Gorska AE, Chytil A, Aakre M, et al. Abrogation of TGF beta signaling in mammary carcinomas recruits Gr-1 + CD11b + myeloid cells that promote metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2008;1:23–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu XD, Wu X, Yin YL, Liu YQ, Geng MM, Yang HS, et al. Effects of dietary L-arginine or N-carbamylglutamate supplementation during late gestation of sows on the miR-15b/16, miR-221/222, VEGFA and eNOS expression in umbilical vein. Amino Acids. 2012;42(6):2111–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dunn GP, Old LJ, Schreiber RD. The immunobiology of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting. Immunity. 2004;2:137–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fukumura D, Kashiwagi S, Jain RK. The role of nitric oxide in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;7:521–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Olson SY, Garban HJ. Regulation of apoptosis-related genes by nitric oxide in cancer. Nitric Oxide. 2008;2:170–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002;6917:860–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008;7203:436–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sica A, Bronte V. Altered macrophage differentiation and immune dysfunction in tumor development. J Clin Invest. 2007;5:1155–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Condeelis J, Pollard JW. Macrophages: obligate partners for tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Cell. 2006;2:263–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ma Q, Wang Y, Gao X, Ma Z, Song Z. L-arginine reduces cell proliferation and ornithine decarboxylase activity in patients with colorectal adenoma and adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;24:7407–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burke AJ, Sullivan FJ, Giles FJ, Glynn SA. The yin and yang of nitric oxide in cancer progression. Carcinogenesis. 2013;3:503–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Granados-Principal S, Liu Y, Guevara ML, Blanco E, Choi DS, Qian W, et al. Inhibition of iNOS as a novel effective targeted therapy against triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17:25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Klug F, Prakash H, Huber PE, Seibel T, Bender N, Halama N, et al. Low-dose irradiation programs macrophage differentiation to an iNOS(+)/M1 phenotype that orchestrates effective T cell immunotherapy. Cancer Cell. 2013;5:589–602.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jayaraman P, Alfarano MG, Svider PF, Parikh F, Lu G, Kidwai S, et al. iNOS expression in CD4+ T cells limits Treg induction by repressing TGFbeta1: combined iNOS inhibition and Treg depletion unmask endogenous antitumor immunity. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;24:6439–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arakawa Y, Qin J, Chou HS, Bhatt S, Wang L, Stuehr D, et al. Cotransplantation with myeloid-derived suppressor cells protects cell transplants: a crucial role of inducible nitric oxide synthase. Transplantation. 2014;7:740–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jayaraman P, Parikh F, Lopez-Rivera E, Hailemichael Y, Clark A, Ma G, et al. Tumor-expressed inducible nitric oxide synthase controls induction of functional myeloid-derived suppressor cells through modulation of vascular endothelial growth factor release. J Immunol. 2012;11:5365–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Poschke I, Mao Y, Adamson L, Salazar-Onfray F, Masucci G, Kiessling R. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells impair the quality of dendritic cell vaccines. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012;6:827–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sax HC. Arginine stimulates wound healing and immune function in elderly human beings. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1994;6:559–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kirk SJ, Hurson M, Regan MC, Holt DR, Wasserkrug HL, Barbul A. Arginine stimulates wound healing and immune function in elderly human beings. Surgery. 1993;2:155–9. discussion 60.Google Scholar
- Kerkar SP, Goldszmid RS, Muranski P, Chinnasamy D, Yu Z, Reger RN, et al. IL-12 triggers a programmatic change in dysfunctional myeloid-derived cells within mouse tumors. J Clin Invest. 2011;12:4746–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Steding CE, Wu ST, Zhang Y, Jeng MH, Elzey BD, Kao C. The role of interleukin-12 on modulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells, increasing overall survival and reducing metastasis. Immunology. 2011;2:221–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Markowitz J, Wesolowski R, Papenfuss T, Brooks TR, Carson WE. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;140(1):13–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Banchereau J, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature. 1998;6673:245–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Steinman RM. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity: enhancing the efficiency of antigen presentation. Mt Sinai J Med. 2001;3:160–6.Google Scholar
- Mahmoud SM, Paish EC, Powe DG, Macmillan RD, Grainge MJ, Lee AH, et al. Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes predict clinical outcome in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;15:1949–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Getnet D, Maris CH, Hipkiss EL, Grosso JF, Harris TJ, Yen HR, et al. Tumor recognition and self-recognition induce distinct transcriptional profiles in antigen-specific CD4 T cells. J Immunol. 2009;8:4675–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Radoja S, Saio M, Schaer D, Koneru M, Vukmanovic S, Frey AB. CD8(+) tumor-infiltrating T cells are deficient in perforin-mediated cytolytic activity due to defective microtubule-organizing center mobilization and lytic granule exocytosis. J Immunol. 2001;9:5042–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vincent J, Mignot G, Chalmin F, Ladoire S, Bruchard M, Chevriaux A, et al. 5-Fluorouracil selectively kills tumor-associated myeloid-derived suppressor cells resulting in enhanced T cell-dependent antitumor immunity. Cancer Res. 2010;8:3052–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barry M, Bleackley RC. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes: all roads lead to death. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;6:401–9.Google Scholar
- Liang M, Yang H, Fu J. Nimesulide inhibits IFN-gamma-induced programmed death-1-ligand 1 surface expression in breast cancer cells by COX-2 and PGE2 independent mechanisms. Cancer Lett. 2009;1:47–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bates GJ, Fox SB, Han C, Leek RD, Garcia JF, Harris AL, et al. Quantification of regulatory T cells enables the identification of high-risk breast cancer patients and those at risk of late relapse. J Clin Oncol. 2006;34:5373–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Merlo A, Casalini P, Carcangiu ML, Malventano C, Triulzi T, Menard S, et al. FOXP3 expression and overall survival in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;11:1746–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kundu N, Fulton AM. Interleukin-10 inhibits tumor metastasis, downregulates MHC class I, and enhances NK lysis. Cell Immunol. 1997;1:55–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blankenstein T. The role of tumor stroma in the interaction between tumor and immune system. Curr Opin Immunol. 2005;2:180–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar