Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Pathological and molecular diagnosis of bilateral inguinal lymph nodes metastases from low-grade endometrial adenocarcinoma: a case report with review of the literature

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 4,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 3,
  • 2Email author and
  • 1Email author
BMC Cancer201818:7

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3944-7

  • Received: 16 February 2017
  • Accepted: 20 December 2017
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Extra-abdominal metastases in low grade endometrial carcinoma are rare events. Inguinal lymphatic spread occurs usually in advanced disease and is associated with abdominal lymph nodes involvement. To our knowledge, isolated inguinal lymph node metastases in patients with early endometrial carcinoma have never been described thus far.

Case presentation

We present an uncommon case of inguinal lymph node metastasis in a 51-year old patient with early endometrial disease without other metastatic involvement. The metastatic loci were analyzed with the recently validated method of mitochondrial DNA sequencing to demonstrate clonality of the lesions.

Conclusions

We describe the first case of inguinal metastasis from intramucous endometrial carcinoma; this case confirms the unpredictable spread of endometrial neoplasia and the importance of both patient’s history and physical examination in good clinical practice.

Keywords

  • Endometrial carcinoma
  • Mitochondrial DNA sequencing
  • Inguinal lymph nodes metastasis

Background

Endometrial Cancer (EC) is the sixth most common malignancy among females worldwide. Most patients usually present with low grade (72.4% grade 1 or 2) and with early stage (74.9% stage 1) diseases. Extra-uterine metastases are rare (8%), and pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node involvement (LNI; stage III) occurs in 5 and 11% of cases respectively [13]. Inguinal lymph nodes metastases are considered as an unusual localization of distant metastases (stage IV) and generally occur in advanced uterine disease with positive pelvic nodes [4].

We describe an uncommon case of inguinal lymph node metastases in a patient with early endometrial disease without other metastatic localizations. The diagnosis of inguinal LNI from EC was performed by standard histological analysis on lymph node dissection specimens. Moreover, the recently validated method of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequencing [5] was used to confirmed the clonality of EC lesions.

Case presentation

A 51-year-old woman was referred to our Gynecology Unit in July 2012, with hypermenorrhea and dysmenorrhea. The patient reported regular menstrual periods, two previous pregnancies with spontaneous deliveries and negative previous pap smear. Patient’s body mass index (BMI) was 23. The anamnesis of the patient was negative for any comorbidities. Family history of cancer was negative, too.

She reported a previous diagnostic hysteroscopy with negative endometrial sampling followed by 5-months progestins treatment without benefits.

On clinical examination and pelvic ultrasound her uterus appeared enlarged (length, anteroposterior and transverse diameter were 107x75x83 mm respectively) due to two intramural and sub-serosal uterine myomas (6 and 5 cm, respectively), with regular endometrium (thickness 8 mm) and ovaries.

Due to symptoms and age, hysterectomy was recommended. The patient declined surgical treatments and was switched to medical therapy with Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) analogue (Leuproreline 3.75 mg monthly intramuscular injections) for 6 months. Six months later, the patient reported recurrent symptoms and bilateral inguinal lymph node enlargement.

Further clinical examination and pelvic ultrasound showed unchanged uterine myomas, regular endometrium (5 mm) and enlarged, fixed right inguinal lymph node of 2 cm. Because of failure of medical therapy, surgical intervention was again proposed. In February 2013 the patient was referred to open surgical intervention: the exploration of all peritoneal surfaces and all abdominal cavities did not uncover any sign of malignancy or endometriosis. The uterus was enlarged (longitudinal diameter 10 cm), its surface was smooth and regular, ovaries were small and regular. Surface of peritoneum and all abdominal organs were free from disease and no enlarged pelvic and para-aortic lymph node were found. Surgical resection included hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic and bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy and peritoneal washing for cytology. Intra-operative frozen sections of right inguinal lymph node dissection were positive for EC, although frozen sections of the endometrium were negative for EC. Due to cancer diagnosis, omentectomy and multiple peritoneal biopsies were performed. No post-operative complications were observed and the patient was discharged from the hospital in good conditions 6 days after surgery.

Final histology identified a focus of well differentiated uterine intramucosal endometrioid adenocarcinoma, without any sign of myometrial invasion (Fig. 1a). Cervix, tubes and ovaries were disease-free. No metastases were found in the peritoneal biopsies or in the pelvic and retroperitoneal removed lymph nodes. However, histology confirmed bilateral inguinal lymph nodes (2 out of 6 overall) positive for endometrial adenocarcinoma (Fig. 1b), with immunohistochemistry positive for CK7, ER, VIM, and negative for CK20 (typical in EC). Moreover, cytology of the peritoneal fluid showed atypical cells.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

A- Endometrial endometrioid carcinoma. Low-grade endometrial carcinoma with well-preserved glandular architecture (arrow). B- Inguinal lymph node metastasis. Lymphoid stromal tissue (asterisk) surrounded and infiltrated by low-grade endometrial carcinoma (arrow)

Positron Emission Tomography (PET), performed 5 weeks after surgery, showed uptake in the right inguinal area referable to residual disease or inflammation, without other pathological areas (Fig. 2). The patient was submitted to pelvic external beam radiotherapy (4500 cGy in 25 fractions) with concomitant weekly cisplatin and subsequent boost on the inguinal region (2000 cGy in 10 fractions). Moreover, 4 additional cycles of Cisplatin (70 mg/mq) every 21 days were administered. To date, the patient is disease-free.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) showed uptake in the right and left inguinal areas referable to residual disease or inflammation, without other pathological areas

In order to confirm histological examination and to understand whether the metastatic inguinal lymph nodes were derived from the EC, we used mitochondrial genome sequencing [6]. Samples of tumor tissue and metastatic lymph nodes were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded. Haematoxylin and eosin sections were reviewed to identify paraffin blocks with tumor areas. A control (non tumor) DNA specimen was obtained from the patient’s saliva after collection of informed consent. Whole mtDNA sequencing was performed on EC, metastatic inguinal lymph node and saliva-derived total DNA as previously described [57]. We used a PCR-based resequencing system which enables identification of sequence variations in the entire human mitochondrial genome and its control region. Total DNA was used for PCR amplification of 46 overlapping fragments covering the entire mtDNA using a set of 46 primer pairs. Overlapping regions of the mitochondrial genome are amplified with specific primer pairs tailed with universal M13 sequences at their 5′ end to generate resequencing amplicons. Amplicons are then used as templates for quick sequencing using universal M13 primers. All primer pairs are ready to use and anneal at the same temperature. The purified PCR product was used for direct sequencing with BigDye kit version 1.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Sequences were run in an ABI 3730 Genetic Analyzer automated sequencing machine. Electropherograms were analyzed with SeqScape version 2.5 software. Mitochondrial DNA mutations detected in this first phase were confirmed using a second PCR reaction. When the latter showed the same mitochondrial DNA variant of interest, the mutation was confirmed on a second extraction of DNA from the same sample to exclude DNA contamination or sample mix-up. The informative nature of mitochondrial mutations was ascertained by sequencing mitochondrial DNA from saliva.

Sequence analysis was performed with MToolBox [8] and the genomes were deposited in public human mitochondrial database HmtDB [9] with the following identifiers: endometrial tumor: PA_EU_IT_0271, metastasis: PA_EU_IT_0272, saliva: PA_EU_IT_0273. The analysis revealed the presence of several informative variants. The m.3170C > A in the MT-RNR2 gene was found heteroplasmic in the saliva and homoplasmic both in the tumor and metastatic nodes (Fig. 3a). By using denaturing high pressure liquid chromatography (DHPLC) (Fig. 3b-c), a method shown to be sensitive enough to detect heteroplasmy levels as low as 2% [10] we were able to confirm the heteroplasmy status of these mutations in the saliva. The m.15851A > G in MT-CYB and the m.15927G > A in MT-TT were found homoplasmic only in the metastasis specimen. The m.15924A > G in MT-TT was present in homoplasmy in the saliva, in heteroplasmy in the tumor tissue and was not present in the metastatic lymph nodes, indicating a reverse shift occurring stepwise during progression from primary tumor to nodal metastasis. Similarly, to the latter, the shift to homoplasmy of the m.3170C > A exclusively occurring in the EC and in the metastatic tissues may be considered as a marker of clonal origin of the two tissues.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

A- Sequence analysis of mtDNA variants in saliva, tumor and metastasis. Red arrows indicate the mutated bases.B- DHPLC analysis of the m.3170 C > M in MT-RNR2 in tumor and saliva. Homo and heteroduplexes are distinguished based on different retention times. Two elution peaks for saliva (heteroduplex and homoduplex) and a single elution curve for tumor are present. Saliva (black), tumor tissue (red). C- DHPLC analysis of the m.3170 C > M in MT-RNR2 in tumor and metastasis. A single elution curve for tumor and metastasis is present. Tumor tissue (red), metastasis (blue)

Discussion

Usually, EC diffuses by direct extension, transtubal dissemination, lymphatic dissemination, and by hematogenous spread. The risk of adnexal, lymph node, and peritoneal metastasis in patients with well-differentiated EC and no myometrial invasion is extremely low [11, 12]. However, we presented an unusual case of bilateral inguinal LNI from a focal intramucosal well-differentiated endometrioid EC without other sites of metastatic spread. To our knowledge, this is the first case of inguinal lymph node metastases, as first presentation, from intramucous EC, which could be explained in two different ways: 1) lymphatic spread via round ligament of a primitive uterine tumor regressed with hormonal therapy; 2) EC arising from the malignant transformation of ectopic foci of endometriosis. In order to explain the first hypothesis, our patient was submitted to hormonal therapy in two different time frames; progestin for 5 months before accessing our Unit and subsequent GnRH analogue after she refused hysterectomy. Generally, well-differentiated EC expresses hormonal receptors and therefore responds to hormonal therapy such progestins, progesterone, oral contraceptives, selective estrogen receptor modulators, GnRH agonists and aromatase inhibitors. As consequence, these therapies may have led to the control/remission of EC primary site in our patient. Indeed, complete response to hormonal therapies are reported in about 72% of young female patients with early well-differentiated EC who prefer fertility-sparing treatments [13]. In these individuals, the combined use of progestin and GnRH analogues leads to better oncological outcomes. Three different groups have reported four cases of inguinal metastasis as presenting symptom of EC. In 1978, Paulussen et al. [14] described two cases of post-menopausal asymptomatic women with inguinal lymph node metastases, six months and two years before diagnosis of a high grade EC. Scholz et al. [3] reported a case of a 54-year old patient with metastatic mucinous adenocarcinoma in inguinal lymph node as first presentation, associated with a well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma with the invasion of the inner half of myometrium and positive pelvic and retroperitoneal nodes. In a most recent case report, Shokouh et al. [4] described a premenopausal woman with enlarged right inguinal lymph node. The biopsy showed a metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown origin. Six months later, a uterine curettage showed a moderately differentiated EC; the patient underwent total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-ophorectomy that revealed a grade 2 adenocarcinoma with invasion of the inner part of the myometrium.

The second hypothesis seems to be less likely. Inguinal endometriosis secondary to the involvement of the extraperitoneal portion of the round ligament is a rare condition, occurring in less than 1% of patients with endometriosis [15]. Moreover, carcinogenesis from endometriosis is a rare event and our patient had no known history of endometriosis and no evidence of ectopic endometrial tissue in any sites.

Due to the peculiarity of this case and for additional diagnostic confirmation of inguinal node metastasis from EC, we performed mtDNA sequencing. MtDNA mutations are extremely common somatic events in human cancers [6], as the mitochondrial genome is more susceptible to mutations occurrence than nuclear DNA. We have previously shown that the detection of a random somatic mtDNA mutation in both EC and metastasis of the same patient may be considered as a marker of clonality of the two lesions, as it is virtually impossible that the same tumor-specific mutation may arise in two independent neoplasms [5]. Similarly, germ-line variants may also be informative when they allow to trace a cell lineage, as it is extremely unlikely that they accumulate to homoplasmy either towards the wild-type or the mutated allele, in independent tumors [16].

Since shift to homoplasmy of the m.3170C > A occurs exclusively in the tumor and in the metastatic tissues, we may assume that the metastatic inguinal lymph node derived from the endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, the m.15924A > G was present in homoplasmy in the saliva but the mutation load was lower in the tumor and it was not present in the metastasis, showing a shift to the wild-type nucleotide and suggesting a reversion during tumor progression and metastasis development, likely due to the occurrence of selective pressures. The other two variants, founded exclusively in the metastatic specimen, may be subsequent to the detachment of cancer cells from the primary tumor, hence defining this specific cancer’s lineage (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Hypothetical mode of progression from normal cells to metastasis. Each circle within a cell represents wild type mtDNA (white background) carrying different mutations (colored sectors). Cells with grey mutations may be positively selected and pink mutations may start becoming selected against during tumor progression of the primary carcinoma (brown-shaded cell among the normal ones). Subsequently, cells devoid of pink mutations and homoplasmic for the grey mutation may be further selected for their metastatic potential, and they may subsequently accumulate green and black mutations (purple-shaded cells among the carcinoma ones)

Conclusions

In the literature, several cases of unusual spread of low grade EC have been reported, such as liver, muscle, scalp and cranial bone metastasis. This testifies the unpredictable spread of endometrial neoplasia, beyond current guidelines. In good clinical practice, patient’s history and physical examination should be carefully performed with special attention to inguinal and retro-clavicular lymph nodes regions. Furthermore, in unusual cases, the study of clonality of the lesions with mtDNA sequencing could be performed in order to provide additional informations for a correct diagnosis.

Abbreviations

CTCAE: 

Criteria for Adverse Events

DHPLC: 

Denaturing high pressure liquid chromatography

EC: 

Endometrial Carcinoma

EIN: 

Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia

GnRH: 

Gonadotropin Releasing Hormon

LNI: 

Lymph node involvement

MiPEO: 

Mitochondria in Progression of Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer

mtDNA: 

Mithocondrial DNA

NSAIDs: 

Nonsteroideal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

PET: 

Positron Emission Tomography

Declarations

Acknowledgements

None.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This work was partly supported by the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) grant IG14242 and by the Italian Ministry of Health grant DISCO TRIP n.GR-2013-02356666 to G.Gasparre. G.Girolimetti is supported by a triennial AIRC fellowship “Livia Perotti”.

Availability of data and materials

The data used for this case report are available from the corresponding author on request.

Authors’ contributions

AMP, GGir, SC, IK, AL, GC, GGas, DS AGM and PC made substantial contributions to acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data: AMP, AL, AGM, SC, PC and PDI acquired and interpreted clinical data. DS and GC acquired and interpreted histological and pathological data. GGir, GGas and IK obtained, analyzed and interpreted molecular data on mtDNA. AMP, GGir, GGas and PDI drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The patient was enrolled in the “Mitochondria in Progression of Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer” (MiPEO) study approved by the local ethical committee at S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Oncologic Gynecology Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi hospital, Bologna, Italy
(2)
Department. Of Surgical and Medical Sciences (DIMEC), Medical Genetics Unit, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
(3)
Radiotherapy Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi hospital, Bologna, Italy
(4)
Pathology Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi hospital, Bologna, Italy
(5)
Nuclear Medicine Unit, Sant’Orsola-Malpighi hospital, Bologna, Italy

References

  1. Colombo N, Preti E, Landoni F, Carinelli S, Colombo A, Marini C, et al. Endometrial cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:33–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Cragun JM, Havrilesky LJ, Calingaert B, Synan I, Secord AA, et al. Retrospective analysis of selective lymphadenectomy in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;23(16):3668–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Scholz HS, Lax S, Petru E, Benedicic C, Winter R. Inguinal lymph node metastasis as the presenting symptom of endometrial cancer: a case report. Anticancer Res. 2002;22:2531–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Shokouh TZ, Kiyanoosh S, Saeed K. Inguinal lymph node metastasis as the first presentation of endometrial carcinoma. Iran J Patholo. 2012;7:246–50.Google Scholar
  5. Guerra F, Girolimetti G, Perrone AM, Procaccini M, Kurelac I, Ceccarelli C, et al. Mitochondrial DNA genotyping efficiently reveals clonality of synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers. Mod Pathol. 2014;27:1412–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandon M, Baldi P, Wallace DC. Mitochondrial mutations in cancer. Oncogene. 2006;25:4647–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Girolimetti G, De Iaco P, Procaccini M, Panzacchi R, Kurelac I, Amato LB, et al. Mitochondrial DNA sequencing demonstrates clonality of peritoneal implants of borderline ovarian tumors. Mol Cancer. 2017 Feb;16(1):47.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Calabrese C, Simone D, Diroma MA, Santorsola M, Gutta C, Gasparre G, et al. MToolBox: a highly automated pipeline for heteroplasmy annotation and prioritization analysis of human mitochondrial variants in high-throughput sequencing. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2014;30:3115–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Clima R, Preste R, Calabrese C, Diroma MA, Santorsola M, Scioscia G, et al. HmtDB 2016: data update, a better performing query system and human mitochondrial DNA haplogroup predictor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 4;45(D1):D698-D706.Google Scholar
  10. Kurelac I, Lang M, Zuntini R, Calabrese C, Simone D, Vicario S, et al. Searching for a needle in the haystack: comparing six methods to evaluate heteroplasmy in difficult sequence context. Biotechnol Adv. 2012;30:363–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Homesley HD, Graham JE, Heller PB, et al. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A gynecologic oncology group study. Cancer. 1987;60:2035–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Quick CM, May T, Horowitz NS, Nucci MR. Low-grade, low-stage endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of 324 cases focusing on frequency and pattern of myoinvasion. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2012;31:337–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chan JL, Wang ET. Oncofertility for women with gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Mar;144(3):631–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Paulussen F, Leyendecker G, Windemuth W. Inguinal lymph node metastasis as primary symptom of endometrial carcinoma (author’s transl). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1978;38(2):95-7. Anticancer Res. 2002;22(4):2531–2.Google Scholar
  15. Candiani GB, Vercellini P, Fedele L, Vendola N, Carinelli S, Scaglione V. Inguinal endometriosis: pathogenetic and clinical implications. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:191–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Foschini MP, Morandi L, Marchetti C, Cocchi R, Eusebi RH, Farnedi A, et al. Cancerization of cutaneous flap reconstruction for oral squamous cell carcinoma: report of three cases studied with the mtDNA D-loop sequence analysis. Histopathology. 2011;58:361–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement