Skip to main content

Table 2 Covariate adjusted interaction tests between tamoxifen treatment efficacy according to recurrence-free interval and different cell proliferation markers analyzed as binary factor. Co-variables included age (≥ 65 versus < 65), grade (grade 3 versus grade 1–2), tumor size (T3–4 versus T1-T2), HER2 status (positive versus negative), and PgR status (positive versus negative)

From: Mitotic count can predict tamoxifen benefit in postmenopausal breast cancer patients while Ki67 score cannot

Variable

levels

HR (95% CI) for tamoxifen vs control

(total follow-up)

Interaction

p-value

HR (95% CI) for tamoxifen vs control

(follow-up truncated at 6 yearsa)

Interaction

p-value

Mitotic count

<  8/ 2mm2

0.38 (0.20–0.70)

0.13

0.24 (0.12–0.49)

0.03

≥ 8/ 2mm2

0.70 (0.40–1.23)

0.64 (0.35–1.17)

Cyclin D1

≤ 50%

0.48(0.25–0.93)

0.48

 

>  50%

0.66 (0.34–1.29)

Ki67

<  5%

0.50 (0.26–0.98)

0.97

≥ 5%

0.50 (0.26–0.93)

CCND1 probeset 1 log 2copy number ratio

<  0

0.39 (0.18–0.86)

0.33

>  0

0.62 (0.18–1.07)

CCND1 probeset 2 log2 copy number ratio

<  0

0.32 (0.16–0.61)

0.04

>  0

0.81 (0.44–1.52)

  1. aAnalysis performed for mitotic count only, since failure of proportional hazard assumption was observed