- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Targeting HOX-PBX interactions causes death in oral potentially malignant and squamous carcinoma cells but not normal oral keratinocytes
© The Author(s). 2018
- Received: 13 December 2017
- Accepted: 20 June 2018
- Published: 6 July 2018
High HOX gene expression has been described in many cancers, including oral squamous cell carcinoma and the functional roles of these genes are gradually being understood. The pattern of overexpression suggests that inhibition may be useful therapeutically. Inhibition of HOX protein binding to PBX cofactors by the use of synthetic peptides, such as HXR9, results in apoptosis in multiple cancers.
Activity of the HOX-PBX inhibiting peptide HXR9 was tested in immortalised normal oral (NOK), potentially-malignant (PMOL) and squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cells, compared to the inactive peptide CXR9. Cytotoxicity was assessed by LDH assay. Expression of PBX1/2 and c-Fos was assessed by qPCR and western blotting. Apoptosis was assessed by Annexin-V assay.
PMOL and OSCC cells expressed PBX1/2. HOX-PBX inhibition by HXR9 caused death of PMOL and OSCC cells, but not NOKs. HXR9 treatment resulted in apoptosis and increased expression of c-Fos in some cells, whereas CXR9 did not. A correlation was observed between HOX expression and resistance to HXR9.
Inhibition of HOX-PBX interactions causes selective apoptosis of OSCC/PMOL, indicating selective toxicity that may be useful clinically.
- HOX genes
- Oral Cancer
The HOX proteins are an important family of transcription factors that control a wide array of functions in embryogenesis and the maintenance of normal tissue [1, 2]. Their dysregulation has been implicated in the development of a variety of cancers [3–5], including oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and we have shown that these changes also occur in cells from potentially malignant oral lesions (PMOLs) [6, 7]. Recent studies have highlighted the therapeutic potential of inhibiting the interaction between HOX proteins and a common group of co-factors, the PBX proteins, using the synthetic peptide HXR9 . The consistent phenotypic effect reported on inhibition of HOX-PBX interactions is induction of apoptosis that has been reported in a number of malignant cell types [9–13]. This has been associated with upregulation of c-Fos protein, which, whilst most often regarded as a proto-oncogene, may in some circumstances be pro-apoptotic .
This project aimed to determine whether targeting HOX-PBX interactions has therapeutic potential in OSCCs and PMOLs by assessing the expression of PBX1 and PBX2 in PMOL and OSCC cells and investigating the effect of HOX-PBX inhibition on these cells and in normal oral keratinocytes.
Clinical details relating to the PMOL and OSCC cell lines used in the project. All patients (except B22, unknown status), were smokers. The primary site for B22 was the lateral tongue
T2 N0 M0
Lymph node metastasis
T4 N3 M0
T4 N1 M0
T2 N2 M0
Lateral tongue leukoplakia
Lateral tongue erythro-leukoplakia
RNA isolation and qRT-PCR
Expression of c-Fos and the HOX cofactors PBX1 and PBX2 was assessed using RNA extracted from cells with the Isolate II RNA Mini Kit (Bioline, UK), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Following cDNA generation, the transcript levels of PBX1 and PBX2 were measured using SYBR Green qPCR (Primer sequences: PBX1 forward: 5’ ATTGCAATCCCCCTGCCTTC 3′ reverse: 5’ TTCAGTCCGGTCTCCTTTGC 3′; PBX2 forward: 5’ GATGTACAGCCCACGGGAAA 3′ reverse: 5’ CCGTTGGGGATGTCACTGAA 3′) on a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies, UK). The expression of c-Fos was assessed using SYBR Green qPCR (Primer sequences - forward: 5’ CCAACCTGCTGAAGGAGAAG 3′ and reverse: 5’ GCTGCTGATGCTCTTGACAG 3′). Data is presented relative to expression of U6. Published expression data for all 39 HOX genes was used to assess possible relationships between peptide sensitivity and HOX gene expression .
The HOX-PBX interfering peptide HXR9 and control peptide (CXR9) were custom synthesised by Bio-Synthesis Inc., (Lewisville, Tx, USA), D-isomer to > 90% purity. HXR9: WYPWMKKHHRRRRRRRRR (2700.06 Da), CXR9: WYPAMKKHHRRRRRRRRR (differs from HXR9 by a single amino acid , 2604.14 Da). The EC50 of HXR9 and CXR9 was calculated for FNB6TERT, OKF4, D19, D35, B16 and B22 cells using increasing doses of peptide (0.5, 5, 12.5, 25, 50, 75 and 100 μM).
Cell death was assessed using a lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cytotoxicity assay (Promega, UK) after 2 h 45 min of peptide treatment, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The induction of apoptosis at EC50 was investigated using the Annexin-V FITC flow cytometry assay (Trevigen, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using a LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Gating was applied to the scatter plots to identify cells as viable, early apoptotic, late apoptotic or necrotic. The position of the gate and the quadrants were kept constant between plots of the same cell type, so that the proportions could be compared between treatments.
Western blotting of whole cell lysate (generated using RIPA buffer) was used to assess expression of PBX1 and PBX2 protein. The antibodies used were anti-PBX1: Abcam ab154285 at 1:500, anti-PBX2: Abcam ab55498 at 1:500, and anti-c-Fos (Abcam; ab209794 at 1:100). HeLa whole cell lysate was used as a positive control.
Statistical analysis was conducted using ANOVA to assess differences between the expression of these markers in the cell lines tested. The correlation between HOX gene expression and PBX expression was assessed by calculating the Spearman Correlation coefficient. Differences were considered significant if p < 0.05.
PMOL and OSCC cells express PBX1 and PBX2
Treatment with HXR9, but not CXR9, results in death of PMOL and OSCC cells
HXR9 induces apoptosis and increased expression of cFOS
Identification of effective molecularly based therapeutics is vital if similar breakthroughs are to be made in the treatment of OSCC as in other solid tumours such as breast cancer. The observation that dysregulation of HOX gene expression occurs early in the pathogenesis of OSCC makes this family of transcription factors an attractive therapeutic target . The main challenge in targeting HOX genes is their functional redundancy and the relatively conserved DNA binding site, thus specifically targeting individual HOX genes is unlikely to be feasible. The discovery that many HOX genes (particularly paralogous groups 1–8) require co-factor binding for stable interaction with DNA opens the potential for interfering with this interaction pharmaceutically using the HXR9 peptide. The effects of HXR9 have been demonstrated in a number of solid malignancies in vitro and in vivo [9, 11, 12, 17]. In this paper, we demonstrate the sensitivity of oral cancer cells to this agent, similar to that reported for other cancers, but in addition, we demonstrate similar effects on cells derived from potentially malignant oral lesions and the lack of effect on normal oral keratinocytes. This measure of selectivity was not seen on comparison of breast cancer cell lines with MCF10A cells where the sensitivity of three of the five cell lines tested was no different from the non-malignant MCF10A cells .
The data also suggests that HOX-PBX inhibition may be an effective strategy to prevent the development of OSCC due to its selective toxicity in PMOL cells. This may have particular benefit in the treatment of large PMOLs, which are not amenable to surgery, and for the prevention of subsequent malignancies in patients who have already developed an upper aero-digestive tract malignancy. These are significant clinical issues in the management of patients with PMOLs and OSCC.
The sensitivity of PMOL and OSCC cells is correlated with HOX gene expression overall and the median expression of the individual clusters, most particularly HOXA cluster genes (paralogues 1–8). Despite modest variation in expression of PBX1 and PBX2, there is no relationship between this and the EC50 of HXR9 in these cells. Presumably, this indicates that PBX co-factors are present in excess and as such, it is the aberrant expression of HOX genes in OSCC pathogenesis that confers the specificity. There was no effect on NOKs at the concentrations tested.
The mechanism of cell death induced by HXR9 has been demonstrated to be apoptosis in other solid malignancies [9, 11, 12, 17]. Similarly, we found that treatment of PMOL and OSCC cells with HXR9 resulted in induction of apoptosis with a significant increase in the number of cells in late apoptosis (Fig. 3).
These data demonstrate the therapeutic potential of HOX-PBX inhibitors not only in OSCC, but also in PMOLs, suggesting a wide range of possible therapeutic uses. This is a specific effect on cells with dysregulated HOX gene expression and iNOKs are not affected.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Craig Murdoch for his assistance with the apoptosis assay and flow cytometry.
CP was funded by an Intercalated Degree Scholarship from the Harry Bottom Trust. This funding was specifically for the project, including data collection, analysis and manuscript writing. SNE is funded by a scholarship by Becas Chile, Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica de Chile (CONICYT), Grant 72160041. This funding was not specifically related to this project.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
KDH, DWL and RM initiated and designed the project. RM provided guidance on the usage of the peptides. CP, RR and SN performed the experimental work described in this paper. CP, KDH and DWL analysed the data and wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All of the cell cultures used in this study were established cell lines and as such no further ethical approvals or consents were required.
Consent for publication
RM and KDH are both members of the Scientific Advisory Board of HOX Therapeutics Ltd.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Mallo M, Wellik DM, Deschamps J. Hox genes and regional patterning of the vertebrate body plan. Dev Biol. 2010;344(1):7–15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wang KC, Helms JA, Chang HY. Regeneration, repair and remembering identity: the three Rs of Hox gene expression. Trends Cell Biol. 2009;19(6):268–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wu XY, Chen HX, Parker B, Rubin E, Zhu T, Lee JS, Argani P, Sukumar S. HOXB7, a homeodomain protein, is overexpressed in breast cancer and confers epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Res. 2006;66(19):9527–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Calvo R, West J, Franklin W, Erickson P, Bemis L, Li E, Helfrich B, Bunn P, Roche J, Brambilla E, et al. Altered HOX and WNT7A expression in human lung cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(23):12776–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Shah N, Sukumar S. The Hox genes and their roles in oncogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(5):361–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Darda L, Hakami F, Morgan R, Murdoch C, Lambert DW, Hunter KD. The role of HOXB9 and miR-196a in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0122285.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Platais C, Hakami F, Darda L, Lambert DW, Morgan R, Hunter KD. The role of HOX genes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2016;45(4):239–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morgan R, Pirard PM, Shears L, Sohal J, Pettengell R, Pandha HS. Antagonism of HOX/PBX dimer formation blocks the in vivo proliferation of melanoma. Cancer Res. 2007;67(12):5806–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morgan R, Simpson G, Gray S, Gillett C, Tabi Z, Spicer J, Harrington KJ, Pandha HS. HOX transcription factors are potential targets and markers in malignant mesothelioma. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Morgan R, Boxall A, Harrington KJ, Simpson GR, Michael A, Pandha HS. Targeting HOX transcription factors in prostate cancer. BMC Urol. 2014;14:17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Morgan R, Boxall A, Harrington KJ, Simpson GR, Gillett C, Michael A, Pandha HS. Targeting the HOX/PBX dimer in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136(2):389–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Plowright L, Harrington KJ, Pandha HS, Morgan R. HOX transcription factors are potential therapeutic targets in non-small-cell lung cancer (targeting HOX genes in lung cancer). Br J Cancer. 2009;100(3):470–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Morgan R, El-Tanani M, Hunter KD, Harrington KJ, Pandha HS. Targeting HOX. PBX dimers in cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(19):32322–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kalra N, Kumar V. C-Fos is a mediator of the c-myc-induced apoptotic signaling in serum-deprived hepatoma cells via the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(24):25313–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hunter KD, Thurlow JK, Fleming J, Drake PJ, Vass JK, Kalna G, Higham DJ, Herzyk P, Macdonald DG, Parkinson EK, et al. Divergent routes to oral cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66(15):7405–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ando H, Natsume A, Senga T, Watanabe R, Ito I, Ohno M, Iwami K, Ohka F, Motomura K, Kinjo S, et al. Peptide-based inhibition of the HOXA9/PBX interaction retards the growth of human meningioma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;73(1):53–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kelly ZL, Michael A, Butler-Manuel S, Pandha HS, Morgan RG. HOX genes in ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res. 2011;4:16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar