Skip to main content

Table 1 Review of trials comparing participation in HPV self-sampling (SS) and reminder letter to attend for a Pap test

From: Rationale and design of the iPap trial: a randomized controlled trial of home-based HPV self-sampling for improving participation in cervical screening by never- and under-screened women in Australia

Study

Area

Eligibility

Intervention

Comparison

Device

Test, HPV+

Participation

Follow-up

       

HPV SS

Pap arm

 

Sancho-Garnier [29]

France

35-69 yrs; no Pap smear for ≥2 years; did not respond to first invitation

HPV SS kit*

Standard invitation

Dacron swab

Abbott real Time, 17.6%

18.3%

2%

41%

Szarewski [25]

UK

25-65 yrs; ≥6 years overdue

HPV SS kit

Standard invitation

Cotton swab

HCII, 8.3%

10.2%

4.5%

87.5%

Wikstrom [22]

Sweden

39-60 yrs; ≥6 years overdue

HPV SS kit* + 2nd reminder

Standard invitation

Qvintip

HCII, 6%

39%

9%

98%

Rossi [26]

Italy

35-65 yrs; 3–5 months overdue

HPV SS kit

2 control arms

Pantarhei device

HCII , 1 = 21.8%, 4 = 6.5%

1 = 19.6%, 2 = 8.7%

3 = 13.9%, 4 = 14.9%

1 = 91%

-Direct mail (1)*

-Standard recall (3)

-On demand (2)

-HPV at the clinic (4)

Virtanen [23]

Finland

30-60 yrs; did not respond to primary invitation

HPV SS kit

Reminder letter

Delphi Screener

HCII

29.8%

26.2%

-

Virtanen [24]

30-60 years; did not respond to primary invitation

HPV SS kit*

Reminder letter

Delphi Screener

HCII, 12.3%

32%

26%

86.6%

Gok [27]

Netherlands

30-60 yrs; did not respond to invitation or 6 month reminder

HPV SS kit*

Second reminder letter*

Delphi screener

HCII, 10.3%

26.6%

16.4%

90.4%

Bais [28]

30-50 yrs, did not respond to invitation or 6 month reminder

HPV SS kit

Second reminder letter

Viba-brush + collection tube

GP 5+/6+ PCR, 8%

34.2%

17.6%

86%

  1. *Pre-invitation letter informing of the arrival of the kit or reminder, and in Finland trial, this letter included “opt out” option.