Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Jun 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
16 Jun 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Danny Welch |
20 Jun 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Doris Benbrook |
29 Jun 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Price |
6 Jul 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philippe Lefebvre |
5 Sep 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Karen Swisshelm |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
5 Sep 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
14 Sep 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Karen Swisshelm |
26 Sep 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Price |
27 Sep 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Doris Benbrook |
29 Sep 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philippe Lefebvre |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
14 Sep 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
12 Oct 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Karen Swisshelm |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
12 Oct 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
14 Oct 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Karen Swisshelm |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
14 Oct 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
28 Oct 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Oct 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-5-140 |
You can find further information about peer review here.