Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
17 Oct 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
4 Nov 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Masao Nagasaki |
18 Nov 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Beckman |
12 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Stuart Baker |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
12 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
8 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Beckman |
13 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Masao Nagasaki |
24 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Stuart Baker |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
26 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Stuart Baker |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
26 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
5 Mar 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Stuart Baker |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
5 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
19 Mar 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Stuart Baker |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
19 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
23 Mar 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
23 Mar 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-9-89 |
You can find further information about peer review here.