Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis

From: Consumption of hot beverages and foods and the risk of esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies

Study source

Study design

Sex

Age at baseline(years)

No of cases

No of participants

Exposure assessment

Outcome assessment

Exposure categories used in meta-analysis

Adjustment for confounders

Quality assessment

Islami et al., [15], northern Iran

Population based case–control

F/M

Cases:64.5 ± 10.1 controls:64.3 ± 10.4

300

871

Interviews

Endoscopy and biopsy samples

Tea: hot/very hot vs. warm

Ethnicity, daily vegetable intake, alcohol consumption, tobacco or opium use, duration of residence in rural areas, education level, and car ownership

7

Lin et al., [35],Southern China

Hospital based case–control

F/M

Cases:54.5 ± 4.9 controls:52.5 ± 3.7

213

426

FFQ

Endoscopically and histologically confirmed

Beverage: hot/very hot vs. lukewarm

Age, sex, educational status, smoking, drinking, body mass index, vegetable and fruit

6

Rolon et al., [45], Paraguay

Hospital based case–control

F/M

≤45:33 46–55:89 56–65:188 ≥ 66:202

131

512

Interviews

Cytology, histology, or radiology

Maté: very hot vs. warm/hot

design variables, lifetime cigarette consumption, and lifetime alcohol consumption

6

Stefani et al., [41], Uruguay

Hospital based case–control

F/M

40-89

166

830

Questionnaire

Histologically verified

Maté: hot/very hot vs. warm

NR

6

Castelletto et al., [43], Argentina

Hospital based case–control

F/M

≤54:80 55–64:129 65–74:127 ≥ 75:57

131

393

Questionnaire

Histological diagnosis

Maté: hot/very hot vs. warm

Education, average number of cigarettes/day, alcohol consumption (ml/day), the design variables

6

Castellsagu´e et al., [11], south America

Hospital based case–control

F/M

64.0(mean)

830

2609

Interviews with structured questionnaire

Histologically confirmed or a cytological or radiological diagnosis

Maté, tea, coffee, coffee with milk: hot/very hot vs. cold/warm

Age group, hospital, residency, years of education, average number of cigarettes/day, average amount of pure ethanol/day and gender

6

Ibiebele et al., [12], Australia

Population based case–control

F/M

18-79

521

1965

FFQ

Registries

Tea/coffee: hot/very hot vs. lowest

Age, gender; cumulative history of smoking in pack years, lifetime mean alcohol intake; heartburn and acid reflux symptoms, body mass index, educational status, aspirin use in previous 5 years, total fruit and vegetable intake and total energy intake in kilojoules

6

Szyman´ska et al., [44], Latin America

Hospital based case–control

F/M

NR

71

228

Lifestyle questionnaire

ICD-O classification

Maté: hot/very hot vs. cold/warm

NR

5

Chen et al., [26], Southern China

Hospital based case–control

F/M

Cases:54.6 ± 6 controls:54.0 ± 7

87

267

Self-designed structured questionnaire

Histologically confirmed

Tea: hot/very hot vs. warm

NR

5

Sewram et al., [42], Uruguay

Hospital based case–control

F/M

35-85

295

685

Questionnaire

Registries

Maté: very hot vs. warm/hot

Amount consumed, and duration of mate´ consumption

5

Tang et al., [19], China

Hospital based case–control

F/M

61 ± 11.4

359

739

Structured questionnaire

Medical records and pathology reports

Tea, water, food: high vs. low or mild

Age, gender, education level, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol drinking, family history of cancer in first-degree relatives, daily intake of vegetables and daily intake of fruit

6

Stefani et al., [40], Uruguay

Hospital based case–control

F/M

40-89

234

702

Questionnaire

Microscopically confirmed

Maté: hot/very hot vs. warm

NR

5

Wu et al., [20], China

Population based case–control

F/M

NR

665

2000

Pretested standardized epidemiologic questionnaire

registry

Tea: high vs. normal

NR

5

Sharp et al., [8], England and Scotland

Population based case–control

F

<75(<80in Trent)

156

312

Interviews

Histologically confirmed

Tea/coffee: hot/burning hot vs. warm

NR

5

Terry et al., [7], Sweden

Population based case–control

F/M

<80

189

1004

interviews

Histologically confirmed

Tea/coffee: hot/very hot vs. cold/lukewarm

Age, gender, body mass index, cigarette smoking, socioeconomic status presence of Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms, frequency quartiles of hot beverage consumption, and quartiles of alcohol, fruit and vegetables, and energy consumption

5

Lubin et al., 2014, South America, [16]

Case–control

F/M

35-85

1310

4118

Questionnaire

Medical records

Maté: hot/very hot vs. warm vs.

NR

5

Wang et al. [37], China

Population based case–control

F/M

Mean: cases 61.51 controls 60.75

355

763

Structured questionnaire

Pathologically diagnosed

Food: hot vs. warm

Age (continuous), marital status and education years

7

Phukan et al., [47], India

Hospital based case–control

F/M

Case:55.0 ± 8.1 control:54.5 ± 7.8

502

1511

Investigation

Histopathologically confirmed

Food: hot vs. moderate

Education, income, chewing betel nut and tobacco, smoking, and alcohol use

4

Wu et al., [13], China

Population based case–control

F/M

<50: 67 50–59:219 60–69: 428 70–79:295 ≥ 80:53

531

1062

Pre-tested standardized questionnaires

Cancer registration database

Food: hot vs. normal

NR

4

Gao et al., [29], China

Population based case–control

F/M

30-74

902

2454

Structured questionnaire

Registry

Hot soup or porridge: hot/burning hot vs. cold/neither cold nor hot

Age, education, birthplace, tea drinking, cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking and consumption of preserved foods, vegetables and fruit

6

Hu et al., [32], China

Hospital based case–control

F/M

35-69

196

588

Interviews

Histopathologically confirmed

Gruel: hot/scalding vs. lowest

Smoking, alcohol, income and occupation

4

Garidou et al., [6], Greece

Hospital based case–control

F/M

<60: 79 60–69:103 ≥ 70: 117

99

299

Questionnaire

Histologically confirmed

Preferrable temperature: very hot vs. cold to hot

Gender, age, birthplace, schooling, height, analgesics, coffee drinking, alcohol intake, tobacco smoking and energy intake

4

Cheng et al., [51], British

Population based case–control

F

Cases:65.9 controls:65.3

74

148

Questionnaire and interview

Histologically confirmed

Preference tea or coffee: hot very/burning hot/hot vs. warm

NR

4

Hanaoka et al., [53], Japan

Hospital based case–control

M

Under 85 years old

141

282

Structured questionnaire

Confirmed histologically by biopsy examination

Preference for high = temperature food and drink: like vs. dislike

Alcohol consumption (g/week)

4

Srivastava et al., [48], India

Case–control

F/M

NR

170

340

Pretested. Semi-structured questionnaires

Endoscopic, radiological and histopathological assessments

Food: hot vs. warm

NR

4

Stefani et al., [39], Uruguay

Hospital based case–control

F/M

40-49:45 50–59:120 60–69:207 70–79:183 80–89:45

200

600

Questionnaire

Newly diagnosed and microspically confirmed

Maté temperature: hot/very hot vs. warm

NR

5

Cheng et al., [27], Hong Kong of China

Case–control

F/M

<45:40 45–54:246 55–64: 722 65–74:696 > =75: 294

400

1998

Interviews with structured questionnaire

Histologically confirmed diagnoses

Preference for hot drinks or soups: yes vs. no

Adjusted for age and education, place of birth, green leafy vegetables, pickled vegetables, citrus fruits, tobacco and alcohol

4

Gao et al., [30], China

Population based case–control

F/M

30-74

653

1965

Structured, standardized questionnaire

Registry

Burning-hot fluids:yes vs. no

NR

5

Cook-mozaffari et al., [49], Iran

Case–control

F/M

NR

344

1032

Questionnaire

Registry

Drinking of hot tea: yes vs. no

NR

4

Guo et al.,[31], China

Nested case–control

F/M

40-69

640

3840

Structured questionnaires

X-ray films and cytological, pathological, surgical specimens

Hot liquid:≥1 vs.0

Years of smoking and cancer history in first degree relatives

6

Ke et al., [34], China

Hospital based case–control

F/M

29-82

1064

2168

Questionnaires and FFQ

Histologically confirmed

Hot Congou drinkers vs. non-hot Congou drinkers

NR

5

Patel et al., [52], Kenya

Hospital based case–control

F/M

Mean:56.1

159

318

Questionnaires

NR

Take hot beverages: yes/no

NR

4

Hung et al., [33], Taiwan of China

Case–control

M

Mean:62.4

267

697

Interviews according to standardized questionnaire

Histologically confirmed

Hot drink or soup: 3+ time per day vs. <3 time per day

Adjusted for age, educational levels, ethnicity, source of hospital, smoking, alcohol drinking and areca nut chewing

4

Chen et al., [25], Taiwan of China

Hospital based case–control

M

40-50:284 51–60::291 61–70 :314 > 70:209

274

922

Interviews

Newly histologically diagnosed

Hot drink or soup: > = 1 time/d vs. <1time/d

Adjusted for age, educational levels, ethnicity, source of hospital, smoking, alcohol drinking, and areca nut chewing

4

Gao et al., [28],China

Case–control

F/M

51-65

600

2114

Questionnaires

Histologically confirmed

Scalding hot food: daily vs. weekly/never/monthly/seldom

NR

4

Sun et al., [36],China

Population based case–control

F/M

Cases:61.21 ± 8.95 Controls:60.84 ± 8.90

250

1000

Questionnaires

Cancer registration database

Hot foods: often vs. sometimes

NR

6

Yang et al., [38], China

Case–control

F/M

Cases:58.1 (8.5) Controls:57.9 (8.8)

185

370

Questionnaires

Histologically diagnosed within half a year

Hot foods: often vs. Rarely/occasionally

NR

6

Jessri et al., [50], Iran

Hospital based case–control

F/M

40-75

47

143

Structured pre-tested questionnaires

Histologically-confirmed

Food and beverages temperature: hot vs. warm/cold

NR

4

Khan et al., [46], India

Case–control

F/M

Case:54.3(7.6) Control:58.1(8.3)

100

200

Questionnaires

Histologically-confirmed

Degree of hotness: hot vs. warm

NR

3

  1. Age presents the range with Mean (SD). Abbreviations: NR = not reported; F = female; M = male.