Skip to main content

Table 5 Risk of oesophageal carcinoma associated with occupational, environmental and health related factors

From: Novel risk factors for primary prevention of oesophageal carcinoma: a case-control study from Sri Lanka

Characteristic

Cases

Controls

Non-adjusted OR (95% CI)

Adjusted OR (95% CI)

No.

%

No.

%

Exposure to agrochemicals

 Ever exposed

19

38.8

19

9.7

5.9 (2.8–12.4)

6.57 (1.4–30.3)

 Never exposed (reference)a

30

61.2

177

90.3

1.0

1.0

Exposure to other home/industry based chemicals

 Ever exposed

11

22.4

9

4.6

6.0 (2.3–15.5)

NSb

 Never exposed (reference)a

38

77.6

187

95.4

1.0

 

Major source of drinking water

 Pipe borne water

27

55.1

65

33.2

2.47 (1.3–4.7)

5.62 (1.7–18.9)

 Ground water (reference)a

22

44.9

131

66.8

1.0

1.0

Indoor air pollution

 Yes

39

79.6

18

9.2

38.6 (16.5–90.0)

NSb

 No (reference)a

10

20.4

178

90.8

1.0

 

Outdoor air pollution

a. Factory in close vicinity

 Yes

4

8.2

16

8.2

1.0 (0.32–3.1)

–

 No (reference)a

45

91.8

180

91.8

1.0

 

b. House situated adjacent to a main road

 Yes

20

40.8

53

27.0

1.86 (1.0–3.6)

–

 No

29

59.2

143

73.0

1.0

 

On prolonged medication

 Yes

4

8.2

13

6.6

1.25 (0.4–4.0)

–

 No (reference)a

45

91.8

183

93.4

1.0

 

On vitamin supplementation

 Yes

1

2.0

3

1.5

1.34 (0.1–13.2)

–

 No (reference)a

48

98.0

193

98.5

1.0

 

Exposure to radiation

 Ever exposed

19

38.8

19

9.7

5.9 (2.8–12.4)

4.64 (1.4–15.5)

 Never exposed (reference)a

30

61.2

177

90.3

1.0

1.0

  1. aThe category having the lesser proportion of cases
  2. bNot significant in the logistic regression model