Skip to main content

Table 2 Risk of cervical cancer according to social parameters and screening attendance

From: Social factors and age play a significant role in cervical cancer and advanced-stage disease among Danish women

 

Risk of getting CC (total study population) (n = 72,913)

Risk of having high-stage disease (total cases with known stage) (n = 11,176)

OR (95%CI)

OR (95%CI)

Education

  

 Medium vs. Short

 High vs. Short

0.76 (0.73; 0.81)

0.64 (0.61; 0.68)

0.71 (0.64; 0.78)

0.54 (0.47; 0.61)

Comorbidity

  

 CCI = 1 vs. CCI = 0

 CCI = 2 vs. CCI = 0

 CCI > 2 vs. CCI = 0

1.06 (0.98; 1.14)

1.07 (0.98; 1.17)

1.14 (1.00; 1.30)

1.13 (0.96; 1.32)

1.13 (0.93; 1.37)

1.12 (0.83; 1.52)

Working status

  

 Senior vs. Working

 Other vs. Working

1.34 (1.26; 1.43)

1.25 (1.17; 1.32)

1.61 (1.42; 1.82)

1.47 (1.30; 1.66)

Socio-economic status

  

 Low vs. High

1.27 (1.22; 1.33)

1.28 (1.17; 1.41)

Civil status

  

 Living alone vs. Living with a partner

1.37 (1.31; 1.43)

1.13 (1.03; 1.23)

Born in Denmark

  

 No vs. Yes

0.84 (0.78; 0.90)

1.08 (0.93; 1.25)

 

Risk of getting CC (total subpopulation with known screening status) (n = 6,125)

Risk of having high-stage disease (total cases in subpopulation with known screening status and known stage) (n = 898)

Screening attendance1

  

 No vs. Yes

2.85 (2.37; 3.13)

2.76 (2.02; 3.76)

  1. Adjusted for age, cohort, and possible interaction
  2. 1 Screening attendance was only evaluated for part of the total study population, i.e., the subpopulation with known screening status, consisting of the following women from the population: 26–49 year old women with an index date between 1st of July 2012 and 31st of December 2016, and 50–64 year old women with an index date between 1st of July 2014 and 31st of December 2016