Table 3 Comparison of the predictive performance of the different models
Training set (95% CI) | Testing set (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
PFS predictive models (C-index) | ||
Conventional model | 0.809(0.778–0.835) | 0.808(0.766–0.851) |
Inter-tumor heterogeneity model | 0.853(0.816–0.870) | 0.849(0.807–0.891) |
Integrated model | 0.898(0.881–0.914) | 0.891(0.860–0.921) |
OS predictive models (C-index) | ||
Conventional model | 0.821(0.751–0.840) | 0.817(0.758–0.877) |
Inter-tumor heterogeneity model | 0.854(0.812–0.876) | 0.852(0.788–0.916) |
Integrated model | 0.894(0.871–0.917) | 0.905(0.873–0.936) |