- Case report
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Primary pancreatic lymphoma – pancreatic tumours that are potentially curable without resection, a retrospective review of four cases
© Grimison et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
- Received: 03 January 2006
- Accepted: 04 May 2006
- Published: 04 May 2006
Primary pancreatic lymphomas (PPL) are rare tumours of the pancreas. Symptoms, imaging and tumour markers can mimic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but they are much more amenable to treatment. Treatment for PPL remains controversial, particularly the role of surgical resection.
Four cases of primary pancreatic lymphoma were identified at Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia. A literature review of cases of PPL reported between 1985 and 2005 was conducted, and outcomes were contrasted.
All four patients presented with upper abdominal symptoms associated with weight loss. One case was diagnosed without surgery. No patients underwent pancreatectomy. All patients were treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and two of four patients received rituximab. One patient died at 32 months. Three patients are disease free at 15, 25 and 64 months, one after successful retreatment. Literature review identified a further 103 patients in 11 case series. Outcomes in our series and other series of chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared favourably to surgical series.
Biopsy of all pancreatic masses is essential, to exclude potentially curable conditions such as PPL, and can be performed without laparotomy. Combined multimodality treatment, utilising chemotherapy and radiotherapy, without surgical resection is advocated but a cooperative prospective study would lead to further improvement in treatment outcomes.
- Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
- Biliary Obstruction
- Polycystic Kidney Disease
- Pancreatic Mass
Primary pancreatic lymphoma (PPL) is rare, comprising less than 0.5% of pancreatic tumours. To distinguish PPL from secondary involvement of the pancreas by non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Behrns' clinical and diagnostic criteria of PPL include: mass predominantly within the pancreas with grossly involved lymph nodes confined to the peripancreatic region, no palpable superficial lymphadenopathy, no hepatic or splenic involvement, no mediastinal nodal enlargement on chest radiograph, and normal white cell count . Presenting symptoms are non-specific, typically including abdominal pain, weight loss, nausea and vomiting ; but also jaundice, acute pancreatitis, and small bowel obstruction . PPL can be difficult to differentiate from pancreatic adenocarcinoma without definitive pathological diagnosis, and correct diagnosis is crucial given that PPL has differing management and usually a much better prognosis. The sizeable cohort of patients with PPL who are not cured with current treatment demands further improvements. Optimal treatment of PPL remains controversial, particularly the role of surgery and radiotherapy.
A retrospective analysis of patients with PPL at our institution was conducted, to examine our treatment outcomes with modern multimodality therapy. We present a case series of four patients – one of the few in the recent literature when newer therapies such as rituximab have become available – and contrast outcomes with previously published case series.
An electronic search through the medical oncology department records of Prince of Wales Hospital (Sydney, Australia) identified four cases of PPL among 481 cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma between 1990 and 2005. Medical records were reviewed, in regards to age, sex, presenting symptoms, radiological appearance, histological diagnosis and method, staging investigations, treatment regimen and outcome.
Staging was assigned by a modification of the Ann Arbor classification ; accordingly stage IE disease is confined to the pancreas, and stage IIE disease involves the pancreas and peripancreatic nodes. Histological categorisation was according to the Revised European American Lymphoma (REAL) classification . Performance status was defined according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology group (ECOG) scale . The prognosis of patients was assessed using the criteria of the International Prognostic Index  for aggressive lymphomas, and the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI)  for follicular lymphomas respectively.
Previously reported cases of PPL published between 1985 and 2005 were identified through a Medline search of the English literature using the keywords of "pancreas" and "lymphoma". Further case series were identified through citation review of identified articles. Single case reports, and cases of stage III/IV disease were excluded.
Patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes
Abdominal pain, nausea, weight loss then jaundice
Vomiting, weight loss
Dyspepsia, weight loss
Abdominal pain, weight loss then jaundice
Delay until diagnosis
Method of diagnosis
Endoscopic ultrasound FNA
6 cm pancreatic mass with biliary obstruction and portal vein involvement
Large peri-pancreatic mass
5 cm pancreatic mass
Pancreatic mass and peripancreatic lymph nodes
Grade II follicular non-Hodgkins lymphoma
Low-intermediate risk (IPI 2/5)
Low-intermediate risk (IPI 2/5)
Low risk (FLIPI 1/5)
Low-intermediate risk (IPI 2/5)
R-CHOP * 4 then involved-field RT
CHOP * 3 then involved-field RT
Involved-field RT then CVP then rituximab
3 * CHOP then involved-field RT
NED at 23 months
Local recurrence at 32 months post-diagnosis, with poor tolerance of 2nd line chemotherapy and rapid treatment-related death
NED at 25 months
Out of field recurrence at 21 months post diagnosis. Salvage chemotherapy and autologous SCT. NED at 64 months from diagnosis
Pre-operative assessment avoided the need for exploratory laparotomy. 4 cycles of CHOP (Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincritine, Prednisone) with concurrent rituximab (anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody, Genentech, CA, USA) was administered with complete response. Chemotherapy was then ceased because of asymptomatic anthracycline-induced decline in ejection fraction. Involved field external beam radiotherapy (36 Gray in 20 fractions) was administered. Fifteen months following diagnosis the patient remains in complete remission.
Systemic combination chemotherapy with dose-modified CHOP was administered, after explanation of risk of significant toxicity and treatment-related end-stage renal failure. Dose-limiting toxicity included neutropaenia, cardiotoxicity and sensory neuropathy, which required cessation of treatment after only three of a planned six cycles. Progress CT scan demonstrated over 50% reduction in size of the pancreatic mass. Involved field radiotherapy (45 Gray in 25 fractions) was well tolerated, inducing radiological complete remission.
Thirty months after diagnosis end-stage renal failure occurred, requiring hemodialysis. Thirty-two months following diagnosis (23 months following therapy) the patient suffered symptomatic mediastinal and gastric recurrence. Second-line combination chemotherapy (DHAC – carboplatin, doxorubicin, cytosine arabinoside, dexamethasone) was poorly tolerated, with febrile neutropaenia and grade three gastrointestinal bleeding. The patient had a limited response, and died a short time later.
A 56 year old man presented with progressive dyspepsia and 12 kg of weight loss over 18 months. Ultrasound and CT revealed a five cm pancreatic mass involving the transverse colon; without lymphadenopathy, mesenteric vessel or hepatic involvement. At laparotomy for a planned Whipple's procedure, histopathology from open biopsy of the pancreatic mass and adjacent nodes was consistent with CD20-positive grade II (mixed small and large cell) follicular lymphoma. PET scan and bone marrow staging revealed regional nodal involvement. Resection was not performed.
Treatment consisted of involved field radiotherapy (36 Gy in 20 fractions), with sequential CVP chemotherapy for five cycles and sequential rituximab for four cycles. Restaging confirmed complete response, and the patient remains in complete remission 25 months following diagnosis.
A 61 year old man experienced progressive epigastric and back pain, 12 kg weight loss and then jaundice. Liver function tests were consistent with biliary obstruction. Ca19.9 was within normal range. CT scan revealed a pancreatic mass and peripancreatic lymphadenaopthy, without mesenteric vessel or hepatic involvement. ERCP and insertion of biliary stent relieved obstruction, however biliary brushings and subsequent FNA were non-diagnostic. Laparotomy and open biopsy of the peripancreatic lymph nodes revealed CD20 positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and resection was not performed.
Treatment consisted of three cycles of CHOP chemotherapy followed by involved field radiotherapy (42 Gy in 19 fractions). The patient had a complete response to treatment, however relapsed out of field 21 months following diagnosis (17 months after treatment), with complete response to second-line ICE chemotherapy, high-dose BEAM chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. After 64 months following diagnosis (37 months from 2nd treatment), the patient remains in remission.
Literature review – patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes – abbreviations and reference list
Pathology (number of cases)
Successful non-operative biopsy
Outcome without resection, chemotherapy or RT
Outcomes with resection
Outcomes with chemotherapy without resection or RT
Outcomes with chemotherapy and RT without resection
Poorly diff lymphocytic (2)
Well diff lymphocytic (1)
T cell (1)
0 of 14
1 of 14
1 of 14
(Received CHOP, RT NR)
6 alive at mean 32 months (18–48 months)
2 died within 3 months
5 died at mean 35 months (6–108)
(5 of 13 received RT)
Follicular mixed (2)
Small cleaved (1)
1 of 2
0 of 2
1 alive at 95 months
(Received CAMEL, 0 RT)
1 alive at 21 months
0 of 12
1 of 12
5 of 12
2 died in post-op period after bypass
(Received chemo, RT NR)
4 alive at 3,36,48,84 months
5 died at 2–11 months
(5 of 9 received RT)
0 of 7
0 of 7
0 of 7
4 died – mean survival 5 months
3 alive at 60,72,96 months
Small cleaved (2)
4 of 12
1 of 12
4 of 12
2 relapsed or died (NR)
(Received chemo, RT NR)
2 died – mean survival 13 months
3 died – mean survival 26 months
(5 died after RT only – mean survival 22 months)
Ezzat Saudi Arabia
2 of 5
1 of 5
CHOP- Bleo (1)
2 of 5
1 alive at 23 months
(Received CHOP, 0 RT)
2 alive at 24,24 months
2 alive at 30,84 months
Mixed follicular (1)
6 of 11
3 of 11
7 of 11
3 alive at 11,13,23 months
(All received CHOP, OPEN or CHOP-Bleo, 0 RT)
1 alive at 191 months
4 alive at 44,55,67,159 months
3 died at 12,16,80 months
Mixed follicular (1)
3 of 8
3 of 8
5 of 8
3 alive at 53,62,64 months
(2 received CHOP and RT)
1 alive at 24 months
2 alive at 51,128 months
2 died at 9,37 months
Nishimur a Japan
B Immunocytoma (2)
B follicular (2)
T peripheral (3)
T anaplastic large (1)
2 of 19
10 of 19
Unspecified chemo (1)
0 of 19
7 died at 1,2,2,3,8,60,72 months
4 died at 9,10,11,27 months
4 alive at 3,4,12,19 months
(6 received chemo, 4 no chemo, 0 RT)
2 died at 2,8 months
High grade B cell (1)
Low grade B (2)
8 of 8
0 of 8
Chemo and auto SCT (2)
3 of 8
3 alive at 5,6,76 months
3 alive at 2,7,72 months
3 of 5
2 of 5
2 of 5
1 alive at 160 months
1 died at 8 months
(Received CHOP or CVP, 0 RT)
1 alive at 60 months
2 died at 67, 88 months
(2 of 3 received RT)
Grimison Australia [current series]
1 of 4
0 of 4
Rituximab- CHOP (1)
4 of 4
1 died 32 months
3 alive 15,25,64 months
107 cases inc. current series
Excluding 2 NR:
29 of 105
23 of 107
80 of 107
Excluding 2 NR:
33 of 105
Excluding 2 NR:
0% (0 of 15) NED
Mean 13 months
2YS 13% (2 of 15)
Excluding 5 NR:
72% (13 of 18) NED
Mean 34 months
2YS 33% (6 of 18)
57% (36 of 63) NED
Mean 38 months
2YS of 62% (28 of 45) – excludes 18 NR
High-grade B cell lymphomas were most commonly identified (45% of cases), followed by low grade B lymphomas (15%) and other B cell lymphomas (34%). T cell lymphomas, although very uncommon (4% of cases), carried a dismal prognosis. Our series was comparable to other series with 75% high-grade B cell lymphomas and 5% low grade lymphomas. Histological diagnosis was established by non-operative biopsy in 29 of 105 cases (28%), laparotomy in 69 of 105 cases (65%), and autopsy in 7 of 105 cases (7%). Surgical resection of the tumour was performed in 23 of 107 cases (21%). Chemotherapy was administered in 80 of 107 cases (75%). Radiotherapy was administered in 33 of 105 cases (31%).
Comparisons were made between treatment groups. Without any definitive treatment, results were uniformly poor with no patients free of disease and poor long-tem survival. Patients treated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy – without resection – did not appear to have worse outcomes than resected patients. Formal statistical comparison was not able to be performed.
In our series of non-surgical multimodality therapy, three of four patients were free of disease at time of follow up, with mean survival 34 months, and 2-year survival of 75%.
Our case series illustrates that the clinical presentation of PPL can be difficult to differentiate from pancreatic adenocarcinoma without definitive pathological diagnosis. Reliance on symptoms, imaging and tumour markers – in the absence of definitive pathological diagnosis of suspected pancreatic adenocarcinoma – can potentially result in the misdiagnosis of a small minority of potentially curable patients. This is important as the prognosis and management of PPL differs greatly from that of adenocarcinoma.
Appearances on CT can be helpful to differentiate the two conditions, but are not definitive[9, 10]. Ca19-9 is the most useful tumour marker in pancreatic carcinoma, but can be misleading as it may also be elevated in other malignancies, particularly of the upper gastrointestinal tract, including PPL as described in case one . Without definitive pathologic diagnosis, potentially curable conditions such as PPL; as well as other malignancies with more favourable prognosis, including periampullary, distal common bile duct, duodenal and mucinous cyst adenocarcinomas, may be misdiagnosed.
Non-operative evaluation and biopsy of pancreatic masses can avoid the need for invasive surgery, if conditions such as PPL are found. The majority of cases of PPL in our literature review required laparotomy for diagnosis, which may have been avoided with successful non-operative biopsy and modern combined modality treatment. Radiological-guided percutaneous FNA of the pancreas is a very useful technique, which requires experienced radiologists and cytopathologists to obtain a diagnosis on a small amount of tissue. Endoscopic ultrasound has greatly improved the accuracy of diagnosis and obtaining diagnostic tissue [13–18]. Diagnosis of PPL may be extremely difficult on haematoxylin-eosin stains alone, and resemble poorly differentiated carcinoma and reticulum cell sarcoma, thus immuno-histochemical stains and flow cytometry are essential. It must be emphasised that cytological diagnosis may not be adequate for diagnosis and categorisation of an abdominal mass, and tissue biopsy should be considered. In some situations (including two of our patients with non-diagnostic FNA), laparotomy may be required for definitive diagnosis.
Treatment of PPL remains controversial – particularly the role of surgery and radiotherapy – and based on our findings we do not support routine pancreatectomy. All patients in our case series received multimodality treatment with both chemotherapy and radiotherapy, without surgical resection. Experience from our case series and literature review (table 2) indicates that this modern treatment regime achieves favourable outcomes, comparable or better than surgical series, without the morbidity of surgical resection. Most modern authors would not recommend surgery except when non-surgical diagnosis is unsuccessful [20–22]. Surgery is difficult in PPL because tumours are large, and often associated with an otherwise histologically normal pancreas, carrying a high risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Technical improvements in pancreatic surgery have led to reduced peri-operative morbidity and mortality, and in contrast Koniaris argues that pancreatectomy should be reevaluated as a method of improving local control and cure rates.
It is pertinent to consider the diminishing role of surgery in other localised extra-nodal lymphoma. Historically, the treatment of localised gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, excluding MALT (mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue)-type lymphomas, was based on surgery – to ensure adequate diagnosis and staging, and maximise survival rates . Three recent large prospective studies [24–26] and two smaller randomised controlled trials [27, 28] of chemotherapy vs. combined surgery and chemotherapy have reported equivalent survival. Thus the role of surgery in gastric lymphoma may be limited to rare patients with acute complications or residual disease following non-surgical treatment [26, 29] In intestinal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, following a prospective study there is a trend away from extensive resection . Localised extraintenstinal non-Hodgkins lymphoma has been treated without surgery for over two decades, following numerous well conducted prospective clinical trials. These changes in management illustrate the need for large cooperative prospective studies in PPL, which will better define any benefit of resection, as well as the role of therapies such as radiotherapy and rituximab.
Radiotherapy has had only limited reported use in the treatment of PPL (see table 2). Potential concerns about the safety of radiotherapy in this region may be unnecessary, as toxicity has been substantially reduced with three-dimensional treatment planning and conformal delivery of radiotherapy. With these modern techniques small bowel toxicity is minimised, and none of our patients required radiotherapy interruption. The role of radiotherapy in early stage high-grade lymphoma remains controversial in a global sense. In localised intermediate and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, chemotherapy using the CHOP regimen plus adjuvant radiotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone. Intensive chemotherapy regimens without radiotherapy have been shown to be superior to CHOP plus involved field radiotherapy. An important question asks whether the addition of adjuvant radiotherapy to more intensive chemotherapy regimens would further improve outcomes. We advocate combined multimodality therapy with both chemotherapy and radiotherapy for PPL.
Two of our four patients received rituximab (anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody, Genentech, CA, USA). We are not aware of its use in other series of PPL, however its use has been reported in gastric lymphoma , and evidence exists of its benefit combined with chemotherapy in other high-grade lymphoma for patients aged over 60.
Biliary sepsis is a potential problem of multimodality therapy in the setting of PPL, due to both the frequent presence of biliary stents, and the risk of neutropaenia. A study of endobiliary stents in multimodality therapy of pancreatic carcinoma reported low rates of complications, with 15 of 101 cases complicated by occlusion or migration, and no uncontrolled biliary sepsis or stent-related death. Another study of patients with malignant biliary obstruction and bile duct stents did not find increased biliary complications in patients receiving chemotherapy. Metal stents are superior to plastic stents for long-term patency [39–41]. Prompt recognition and treatment of biliary complications is important to allow ongoing therapy, as happened on several occasions to our patients.
We have examined for any possible association between polycystic kidney disease and PPL, given the existence of both conditions in case two. Although polycystic kidney disease has been associated with pancreatic cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma in a small number of case reports [42–44], we are not aware of any association with pancreatic lymphoma.
The study of PPL is limited by the rarity of the condition, and the consequent lack of randomised trials or large case series. The comparison of our case series with other series must be interpreted cautiously, given variable follow-up (range two – 108 months), incomplete data in some case series[2, 3, 12, 45], and the inherent publication bias within case series favouring positive results, as described by Albrecht. We strongly advocate a multi-centre prospective study of patients with PPL to improve patient outcomes.
PPL is a rare but potentially curable pancreatic tumour, and mandates pathological diagnosis of all pancreatic masses, as its treatment and prognosis differs from adenocarcinoma. Non-operative diagnosis may avoid the need for surgery, as outcomes with chemotherapy and radiotherapy – without surgical resection – compare favourably to surgical series. Nevertheless a sizeable cohort of patients are not cured with modern therapy, and we advocate a prospective study to further improve treatment outcomes.
Written consent was obtained from the patients or their relatives for publication of the study.
- Baylor SM, Berg JW: Cross-classification and survival characteristics of 5,000 cases of cancer of the pancreas. J Surg Oncol. 1973, 5 (4): 335-358.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Behrns KE, Sarr MG, Strickler JG: Pancreatic lymphoma: is it a surgical disease?. Pancreas. 1994, 9 (5): 662-667. 10.1097/00006676-199409000-00019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nayer H, Weir EG, Sheth S, Ali SZ: Primary pancreatic lymphomas: a cytopathologic analysis of a rare malignancy. Cancer. 2004, 102 (5): 315-321. 10.1002/cncr.20488.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenberg SA: Validity of the Ann Arbor staging classification for the non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Cancer Treat Rep. 1977, 61 (6): 1023-1027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Stein H, Banks PM, Chan JK, Cleary ML, Delsol G, De Wolf-Peeters C, Falini B, Gatter KC, Grogan TM, Isaacson PG, Knowles DM, Mason DY, Muller-Hermelink HK, Pileri SA, Piris MA, Ralfkiaer E, Warnke RA: A revised European-American classification of lymphoid neoplasms: a proposal from the International Lymphoma Study Group. Blood. 1994, 84 (5): 1361-1392.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP: Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982, 5 (6): 649-655.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The International Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project: A Predictive Model for Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1993, 329 (14): 987-994. 10.1056/NEJM199309303291402.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Solal-Celigny P, Roy P, Colombat P, White J, Armitage JO, Arranz-Saez R, Au WY, Bellei M, Brice P, Caballero D, Coiffier B, Conde-Garcia E, Doyen C, Federico M, Fisher RI, Garcia-Conde JF, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, Haioun C, LeBlanc M, Lister AT, Lopez-Guillermo A, McLaughlin P, Milpied N, Morel P, Mounier N, Proctor SJ, Rohatiner A, Smith P, Soubeyran P, Tilly H, Vitolo U, Zinzani PL, Zucca E, Montserrat E: Follicular lymphoma international prognostic index. Blood. 2004, 104 (5): 1258-1265. 10.1182/blood-2003-12-4434.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lawler LP, Horton KM, Fishman EK: Peripancreatic masses that simulate pancreatic disease: spectrum of disease and role of CT. Radiographics. 2003, 23 (5): 1117-1131.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Teefey SA, Stephens DH, Sheedy PF: CT appearance of primary pancreatic lymphoma. Gastrointest Radiol. 1986, 11 (1): 41-43. 10.1007/BF02035029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mann DV, Edwards R, Ho S, Lau WY, Glazer G: Elevated tumour marker CA19-9: clinical interpretation and influence of obstructive jaundice. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000, 26 (5): 474-479. 10.1053/ejso.1999.0925.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hart MJ, White TT, Brown PC, Freeny PC: Potentially curable masses in the pancreas. Am J Surg. 1987, 154 (1): 134-136. 10.1016/0002-9610(87)90303-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arcidiacono PG, Carrara S: Endoscopic ultrasonography: impact in diagnosis, staging and management of pancreatic tumors. An overview. Jop. 2004, 5 (4): 247-252.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz MR: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Cancer. 2004, 102 (4): 203-206. 10.1002/cncr.20486.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jhala NC, Jhala D, Eltoum I, Vickers SM, Wilcox CM, Chhieng DC, Eloubeidi MA: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a powerful tool to obtain samples from small lesions. Cancer. 2004, 102 (4): 239-246. 10.1002/cncr.20451.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kahl S, Malfertheiner P: Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of patients with solid pancreatic masses. Dig Dis. 2004, 22 (1): 26-31. 10.1159/000078732.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mesa H, Stelow EB, Stanley MW, Mallery S, Lai R, Bardales RH: Diagnosis of nonprimary pancreatic neoplasms by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol. 2004, 31 (5): 313-318. 10.1002/dc.20142.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weynand B, Deprez P: Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration in biliary and pancreatic diseases: pitfalls and performances. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2004, 67 (3): 294-300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ackerman NB, Aust JC, Bredenberg CE, Hanson VA, Rogers LS: Problems in differentiating between pancreatic lymphoma and anaplastic carcinoma and their management. Ann Surg. 1976, 184 (6): 705-708.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Arcari A, Anselmi E, Bernuzzi P, Berte R, Lazzaro A, Moroni CF, Trabacchi E, Vallisa D, Vercelli A, Cavanna L: Primary pancreatic lymphoma. Report of five cases. Haematologica. 2005, 90 (2): ECR09-Google Scholar
- Bouvet M, Staerkel GA, Spitz FR, Curley SA, Charnsangavej C, Hagemeister FB, Janjan NA, Pisters PW, Evans DB: Primary pancreatic lymphoma. Surgery. 1998, 123 (4): 382-390.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Webb TH, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Jones RJ, Cameron JL: Pancreatic lymphoma. Is surgery mandatory for diagnosis or treatment?. Ann Surg. 1989, 209 (1): 25-30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Koniaris LG, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ, Abrams RA, Colemann J, Nakeeb A, Pitt H, Cameron JL: Is there a role for surgical resection in the treatment of early-stage pancreatic lymphoma?. J Am Coll Surg. 2000, 190 (3): 319-330. 10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00291-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Binn M, Ruskone-Fourmestraux A, Lepage E, Haioun C, Delmer A, Aegerter P, Lavergne A, Guettier C, Delchier JC: Surgical resection plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone: comparison of two strategies to treat diffuse large B-cell gastric lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2003, 14 (12): 1751-1757. 10.1093/annonc/mdg495.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koch P, del Valle F, Berdel WE, Willich NA, Reers B, Hiddemann W, Grothaus-Pinke B, Reinartz G, Brockmann J, Temmesfeld A, Schmitz R, Rube C, Probst A, Jaenke G, Bodenstein H, Junker A, Pott C, Schultze J, Heinecke A, Parwaresch R, Tiemann M: Primary gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: II. Combined surgical and conservative or conservative management only in localized gastric lymphoma – results of the prospective German Multicenter Study GIT NHL 01/92. J Clin Oncol. 2001, 19 (18): 3874-3883.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koch P, Probst A, Berdel WE, Willich NA, Reinartz G, Brockmann J, Liersch R, del Valle F, Clasen H, Hirt C, Breitsprecher R, Schmits R, Freund M, Fietkau R, Ketterer P, Freitag E-M, Hinkelbein M, Heinecke A, Parwaresch R, Tiemann M: Treatment Results in Localized Primary Gastric Lymphoma: Data of Patients Registered Within the German Multicenter Study (GIT NHL 02/96). J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23 (28): 7050-7059. 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aviles A, Diaz-Maqueo J, Torre Adl, et al: Is surgery necessary in the treatment of primary gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Leukemia & Lymphoma. 1991, 5: 365-369.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aviles A, Nambo MJ, Neri N, Huerta-Guzman J, Cuadra I, Alvarado I, Castaneda C, Fernandez R, Gonzalez M: The role of surgery in primary gastric lymphoma: results of a controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2004, 240 (1): 44-50. 10.1097/01.sla.0000129354.31318.f1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yoon SS, Coit DG, Portlock CS, Karpeh MS: The diminishing role of surgery in the treatment of gastric lymphoma. Ann Surg. 2004, 240 (1): 28-37. 10.1097/01.sla.0000129356.81281.0c.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Daum S, Ullrich R, Heise W, Dederke B, Foss H-D, Stein H, Thiel E, Zeitz M, Riecken E-O: Intestinal Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study From the German Study Group on Intestinal Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2003, 21 (14): 2740-2746. 10.1200/JCO.2003.06.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wenz F, Tiefenbacher U, Fuss M, Lohr F: Should patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas be irradiated?. Pancreatology. 2003, 3 (5): 359-365. 10.1159/000073650. discussion 365–356View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller TP, Dahlberg S, Cassady JR, Adelstein DJ, Spier CM, Grogan TM, LeBlanc M, Carlin S, Chase E, Fisher RI: Chemotherapy alone compared with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for localized intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1998, 339 (1): 21-26. 10.1056/NEJM199807023390104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reyes F, Lepage E, Ganem G, Molina TJ, Brice P, Coiffier B, Morel P, Ferme C, Bosly A, Lederlin P, Laurent G, Tilly H: ACVBP versus CHOP plus radiotherapy for localized aggressive lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352 (12): 1197-1205. 10.1056/NEJMoa042040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Armitage JO: Defining the stages of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma – a work in progress. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352 (12): 1250-1252. 10.1056/NEJMe048345.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wohrer S, Puspok A, Drach J, Hejna M, Chott A, Raderer M: Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) for treatment of early-stage gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2004, 15 (7): 1086-1090. 10.1093/annonc/mdh261.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, Herbrecht R, Tilly H, Bouabdallah R, Morel P, Van Den Neste E, Salles G, Gaulard P, Reyes F, Lederlin P, Gisselbrecht C: CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002, 346 (4): 235-242. 10.1056/NEJMoa011795.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pisters PW, Hudec WA, Lee JE, Raijman I, Lahoti S, Janjan NA, Rich TA, Crane CH, Lenzi R, Wolff RA, Abbruzzese JL, Evans DB: Preoperative chemoradiation for patients with pancreatic cancer: toxicity of endobiliary stents. J Clin Oncol. 2000, 18 (4): 860-867.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lofts FJ, Evans TR, Mansi JL, Glees JP, Knight MJ: Bile duct stents: is there an increased rate of complications in patients receiving chemotherapy?. Eur J Cancer. 1997, 33 (2): 209-213. 10.1016/S0959-8049(96)00365-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davids PH, Groen AK, Rauws EA, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K: Randomised trial of self-expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Lancet. 1992, 340 (8834–8835): 1488-1492. 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92752-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knyrim K, Wagner HJ, Pausch J, Vakil N: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of metal stents for malignant obstruction of the common bile duct. Endoscopy. 1993, 25 (3): 207-212.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pinol V, Castells A, Bordas JM, Real MI, Llach J, Montana X, Feu F, Navarro S: Percutaneous self-expanding metal stents versus endoscopic polyethylene endoprostheses for treating malignant biliary obstruction: randomized clinical trial. Radiology. 2002, 225 (1): 27-34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gates LK Jr, Holladay DV: A syndrome of hereditary pancreatic adenocarcinoma and cysts of the liver and kidneys. Gastroenterology. 2002, 122 (3): 796-799. 10.1053/gast.2002.31900.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Niv Y, Turani C, Kahan E, Fraser GM: Association between pancreatic cystadenocarcinoma, malignant liver cysts, and polycystic disease of the kidney. Gastroenterology. 1997, 112 (6): 2104-2107. 10.1053/gast.1997.v112.pm9178704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takeh H, Phillipart P, Brandelet B, Nemec E, Bidgoli SJ, da Costa PM: Pancreatic mucinous cystadenoma associated with celiac disease and polycystic kidneys. Case report and short review of the literature. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002, 49 (46): 944-946.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mansour GM, Cucchiaro G, Niotis MT, Fetter BF, Moore J, Rice RR, Branum GD, Meyers WC: Surgical management of pancreatic lymphoma. Arch Surg. 1989, 124 (11): 1287-1289.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Albrecht J, Meves A, Bigby M: Case reports and case series from Lancet had significant impact on medical literature. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005, 58 (12): 1227-1232. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.04.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tuchek JM, De Jong SA, Pickleman J: Diagnosis, surgical intervention, and prognosis of primary pancreatic lymphoma. Am Surg. 1993, 59 (8): 513-518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ezzat A, Jamshed A, Khafaga Y, Rahal M, Linjawi T, Martin J, Taha I: Primary pancreatic non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1996, 23 (2): 109-112. 10.1097/00004836-199609000-00008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nishimura R, Takakuwa T, Hoshida Y, Tsujimoto M, Aozasa K: Primary pancreatic lymphoma: clinicopathological analysis of 19 cases from Japan and review of the literature. Oncology. 2001, 60 (4): 322-329. 10.1159/000058528.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://0-www.biomedcentral.com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1471-2407/6/117/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.