Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Study Protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

Efficacy of adding levofloxacin to gemcitabine and nanoparticle-albumin-binding paclitaxel combination therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial (T-CORE2201)

BMC Cancer volume 24, Article number: 262 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Advanced pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths. For patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, gemcitabine and nanoparticle albumin-binding paclitaxel (nabPTX) combination (GEM/nabPTX) therapy is one of the recommended first-line treatments. Several retrospective studies have suggested that the addition of levofloxacin improves the efficacy of GEM/nabPTX therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. This prospective study aims to evaluate whether the addition of antibiotics improves the treatment efficacy of GEM/nabPTX as a first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Methods

This multicenter, prospective, randomized, phase 2 trial will included 140 patients. Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the GEM/nabPTX therapy group or the GEM/nabPTX plus levofloxacin group. The primary endpoint for the two groups is median progression-free survival time (mPFS) for the full analysis set (FAS). The secondary endpoints for the two groups are median overall survival (mOS), response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse event (AE) for the FAS and mPFS, mOS, RR, DCR, and AE for the per-protocol set. This study will enroll patients treated with GEM/nabPTX as the first-line chemotherapy for stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Discussion

GEM/nabPTX is a standard first-line chemotherapy regimen for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Recently, the superiority of 5-fluorouracil, liposomal irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combination therapy (NALIRIFOX) to GEM/nabPTX as first-line therapy for pancreatic cancer has been reported. However, the efficacy of NALIRIFOX is inadequate. Based on previous retrospective studies, it is hypothesized that treatment efficacy will improve when levofloxacin is added to GEM/nabPTX therapy. If the AEs (such as leukopenia, neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy) that occur at an increased rate with levofloxacin and GEM/nabPTX combination therapy can be carefully monitored and properly managed, this simple intervention can be expected to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Trial registration

This study was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT; registry number: jRCTs021230005).

Peer Review reports

Background

Advanced pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death [1]. The 5-year survival rate of advanced pancreatic cancer is less than 5% [2]. Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer are typically treated with systemic chemotherapy. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline suggests the use of 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin plus irinotecan combination therapy (FOLFIRINOX) or gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-binding paclitaxel (nabPTX) combination therapy (GEM/nabPTX) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer [3].

The reported response rate, median progression-free survival time (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) time in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer are 31.6%, 6.4 months, and 11.1 months, respectively, with FOLFIRINOX therapy and 23.0%, 5.5 months, and 8.5 months, respectively, with GEM/nabPTX therapy [4, 5]. However, the treatment efficacy of these chemotherapy regimens remains inadequate.

Recently, an interaction was reported between the treatment efficacy of GEM and the use of antibiotics in vitro [6]. The study found that GEM is metabolized into the inactive form 2′,2′-difluorodeoxyuridine by the cytidine deaminase long isoform (CDDL) secreted by intratumoral bacteria. In vivo analysis showed that treatment with antibiotics reduced the numbers of bacteria in the xenograft tumor tissue and improved the efficacy of GEM. Previous studies have also shown that bacteria secreting the CDDL infiltrate the pancreatic cancer tissues in more than 70% of patients with pancreatic cancer [6, 7]. CDDL is secreted by several types of bacteria including the Citrobacter, Enterobacter, or Klebsiella [8]. These bacterial genera are sensitive to quinolone antibiotics [9]. Based on these findings, it has been hypothesized that the concomitant administration of quinolone antibiotics in patients with pancreatic cancer improves the efficacy of GEM by reducing the number of CDDL- secreting bacteria in the tumor tissue.

A retrospective study reported that the addition of antibiotics improved the efficacy of a GEM-containing regimen in patients with advanced malignant tumors, including those with pancreatic cancer [10]. In that study, the mPFS and mOS in the antibiotic untreated group or the antibiotic-treated group were 2.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.86–3.73) or 4.9 (95% CI: 3.47–6.0) months (p < 0.0001) and 7.53 (95% CI: 5.63–9.57) months or 13.83 (95% CI: 10.83–16.43) months (p < 0.001), respectively. Further retrospective studies have reported an improvement in the efficacy of GEM-containing regimens in patients with pancreatic cancer through the addition of antibiotics [11, 12].

In this multicenter randomized phase 2 study, we aim to evaluate the treatment efficacy and safety of GEM/nabPTX and levofloxacin combination therapy as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Trial design

In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, phase 2 trial, patients with advanced pancreatic cancer will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the GEM/nabPTX therapy group or the GEM/nabPTX plus levofloxacin group. A total of 140 patients will be enrolled, with each group comprising 70 patients. The study design is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study schema

Full size image

The following seven institutions will participate in the study: Tohoku University Hospital; the Department of Medical Oncology, Osaki Citizen Hospital; Sendai Kousei Hospital; Akita University Graduate School of Medicine; Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine; Miyagi Cancer Center; and Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital.

The study period is from May 19, 2023 (date of publication of the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT)) to November 31, 2027. The participants will be followed up for 2 years.

Participants

The inclusion and exclusion criteria are summarized below. The complete lists of inclusion and exclusion criteria are described in Supplementary Table 1.

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria are as follows: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) of 0 or 1, age > 20 and < 80 years, stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with GEM/nabPTX as first-line treatment, the presence of at least one RECIST version 1.1 evaluable lesion, and patients eligible for protocol treatment and oral levofloxacin based on blood test results.

Exclusion criteria

The exclusion criteria are as follows: GEM or nabPTX treatment within 6 months prior to enrollment or focal radiation, a history of other treatments that may affect the efficacy of the protocol treatment, inability to take oral levofloxacin or antibiotic treatment for more than five consecutive days within 1 month prior to enrollment, treatment with drugs contraindicated for use with levofloxacin, other conditions that may affect the efficacy or safety of levofloxacin, and inability to continue the protocol treatment.

Enrollment and allocation

Eligible patients will be randomized without blinding to the GEM/nabPTX or GEM/nabPTX plus levofloxacin combination groups. Randomization will be performed using the Viedoc 4â„¢ (Electric Data Capture (EDC) system) by the Clinical Research, Innovation and Education Center, Tohoku University Hospital (CRIETO).

Interventions

The dose and schedule of the GEM/nabPTX therapy (the same for each group in this study) are GEM 1,000 mg/m2 and nabPTX 125 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks.

Patients in the GEM/nabPTX plus levofloxacin group will receive levofloxacin in addition to GEM/nabPTX therapy.

The dose and schedule of GEM/nabPTX and levofloxacin therapy are shown in Fig. 2a and b, respectively. Almost all of levofloxacin is metabolized by the kidneys and excreted from the body. Therefore, dosage should be adjusted according to renal function. In this clinical trial, the dose of levofloxacin will be adjusted based on the creatinine clearance calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula using blood sampling data from day 1 and day 8. Doses have been determined based on previous reports.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The schedule of the protocol treatment of the present study. The schedule of GEM/nabPTX group is shown in a, and of GEM/nabPTX and levofloxacin combination group is shown in b

Full size image

As shown in Fig. 2b, levofloxacin was adjusted according to the renal function status (based on previous reports [13]) and administered for 10 or 11 days from the initiation of GEM/nabPTX therapy. The duration of oral levofloxacin therapy has been extensively considered to minimize the occurrence of adverse events and to maintain patient medication compliance. Patients will return the unused levofloxacin and an empty package. The participant timelines are presented in Table 1. Consent will be obtained from patients who meet the inclusion criteria at the pre-enrollment visit, and protocol treatment will be initiated. ECOG-PS, blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature, and adverse events will be monitored at each outpatient visit. Imaging studies will be performed every 2 months (± 1 week). At the end of the protocol treatment, height, weight, blood sampling data, and adverse events will be monitored, and tumor marker testing and imaging studies will be performed. After completion of the protocol treatment, imaging studies will be performed every 2 months (± 1 week) and survival survey will continue.

Table 1 Participant time line
Full size table

Administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to increase neutrophil count is allowed for neutropenia, as is the administration of medications such as 5-HT3 antagonists, aprepitant, corticosteroids, metoclopramide, and prochlorperazine for GEM/nabPTX-induced nausea. Radiation for pain relief is allowed for pain caused by bone metastases (the radiation site and dose are determined in consultation with the radiologist). Administration of medications for other complications (e.g., opioids, bisphosphonates, anti-RNKL antibodies.) is allowed. The use of antibiotics (any type) is allowed for the treatment of any infection in both groups at the discretion of the treating physician. For grade 3 or higher neutropenia, treatment with antibiotics (any type) is allowed at the discretion of the treating physician.

The prohibited therapies included treatment with any anticancer drug other than GEM or nabPTX, irradiation other than palliative irradiation, surgery to resect the primary or metastatic lesion, tumor embolization, or any biological response modifiers.

Withdrawal criteria

GEM/nabPTX therapy

GEM/nabPTX therapy in each group will be repeated until the following criteria for withdrawal are met: 1) exacerbation of pancreatic cancer (exacerbations as defined by RECIST version 1.1 and clinical progression such as worsening of non-target lesions (ascites or pleural effusion), worsening of subjective symptoms, or decrease in ECOG-PS) after starting the protocol treatment; 2) discontinuation of the protocol treatment because of the occurrence of adverse events; 3) patient request for discontinuation of the protocol treatment because of the occurrence of adverse events; 4) death during the protocol treatment; 5) delay in the start date of the next term of the protocol treatment by more than 28 days from the date of the previous protocol treatment, due to unavoidable circumstances other than the occurrence of adverse events; 6) ineligibility to participate in the study determined after enrollment or a decision by a physician to discontinue the protocol treatment for any reason.

Levofloxacin

Immediate discontinuation of levofloxacin is required if any of the following occur:

  1. 1)

    Any type and grade of allergy or anaphylaxis following the use of levofloxacin.

  2. 2)

    Liver dysfunction of grade 3 or higher. Levofloxacin administration will not be resumed even if liver function improves after discontinuation of the antibiotic. The actual dose of levofloxacin will be monitored in each patient and the correlation between the dose of levofloxacin and the efficacy of the protocol treatment will be analyzed.

Subsequent treatment

Subsequent-treatment after the completion of the protocol treatment is not specified.

Statistical analyses

The full analysis set (FAS; Fig. 1) is defined as patients who meet the inclusion criteria and are treated using the protocol at least once. The per-protocol set (PPS, Fig. 1) is defined as patients subtracted from the FAS because of treatment with antibiotics other than levofloxacin (interventional treatment) during the protocol treatment. All data will be statistically analyzed at the Clinical Research, Innovation, and Education Center, Tohoku University Hospital (CRIETO).

Definition of sample size

Based on three previous retrospective studies [10,11,12], the mPFS duration is 3 months for the GEM/nabPTX therapy group and 5 months for the GEM/nabPTX plus levofloxacin group. The required number of patients has been calculated based on an enrollment period of 3 years, a follow-up period of 1 year, a two-sided significance level of 5%, and a statistical power of 85%. According to the calculations, 64 cases in each group are required to achieve a significant difference. Since a dropout rate of 10% is expected in each group, 64 + 64 × 0.1 = 70 cases (70 cases in both groups × 2 = 140 cases) is the number of cases needed to obtain a significant difference in this clinical trial.

Outcomes

Using the FAS (cohorts A and B (Fig. 1)), the mPFS will be compared between cohorts A and B as the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints will be the median overall survival (mOS), response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) of the FAS. The mPFS, mOS, RR, DCR, and AE of the PPS (cohorts C and D) will also be evaluated as secondary endpoints. The response rate will be calculated in patients with at least two imaging assessments to determine efficacy, and the response rate will be compared between the two groups. DCR is defined as the time from the start of the protocol treatment to the time when pancreatic cancer is observed. It is calculated as: the (number of patients with CR + PR + SD) / (number of patients with CR + PR + SD + PD). Monitoring will be performed for all Grade 3 or higher adverse events (including AEs of special interest with concomitant antibiotics and chemotherapy) observed during the study period.

The principal investigator, co-investigators, and research staff will enter the clinical information into the EDC system (Viedoc 4â„¢) as soon as the clinical data of each participant are available. This prevents the leakage of personal information; investigators will use the participant identification number when entering the information into the EDC system (Viedoc 4â„¢). Data monitoring will be performed by the data center at CRIETO.

AEs will be graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. All AEs (> grade 3) in this trial will be entered into the EDC system. If severe AEs (SAEs) are observed in any patient in this trial, the SAE report from each responsible physician will be e-mailed or faxed to the T-CORE study authorities within 72 h of the event and reported by the T-CORE authorities to the principal investigator (Chikashi Ishioka).

Exploratory study

Stool, blood, and cancer tissue samples will be collected from patients participating in this trial and agreeing to provide the required samples. Stool and blood samples will be collected on days 1 and 8. We hypothesize that not only changes in the amount of bacteria in tissues, but also changes in metabolites in serum and feces based on changes in the bacterial flora produced in the body by the antibiotic treatment may be involved in improving the efficacy of GEM/nabPTX. Mass spectrometry will be used to analyze changes in metabolites in serum and feces due to antibiotic treatment. Since metabolites with altered levels are likely to affect the efficacy of GEM/nabPTX, we will focus on these metabolites and conduct basic experiments.

Discussion

GEM/nabPTX therapy is a standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer [5]. A previous study reported a median PFS of 5.5 months with GEM/nabPTX therapy. The NAPOLI-3 trial comparing 5-fluorouracil, liposomal irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combination therapy (NALIRIFOX) to GEM/nabPTX as a first-line therapy for pancreatic cancer showed the superiority of NALIRIFOX over GEM/nabPTX in OS and PFS [14]. However, the previously reported treatment efficacy of first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer is low. Therefore, improving the treatment efficacy of currently available chemotherapies for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer remains an important challenge.

Pancreatic cancer is associated with a wide variety of gene mutations [15] and the pancreatic cancer tissue microenvironment is composed of cancer cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and immune cells [16]. Various subtypes of pancreatic cancer based on these characteristics have emerged. Changes in gut microbiota have been reported to affect the efficacy of cytotoxic anticancer drugs [17]. Furthermore, metabolites secreted from gut microbiota have been reported to affect various cancers via blood [18]. As changes in gut bacteria induced by antimicrobial agents may alter the types and amounts of metabolites in stool and blood, in this study, we will conduct translational research using blood and stool samples, as described in the Exploratory Research section, to identify metabolites involved in the therapeutic effect of GEM/nabPTX in pancreatic cancer. The discovery of these metabolites may lead to the development of new therapeutic targets to improve the therapeutic efficacy of GEM/nabPTX in pancreatic cancer.

Quinolones are broad-spectrum antibiotics. Quinolones are generally safe and are commonly used for pneumonia and other infections. Despite their safety, an increase in the risk of AEs such as tendinopathy, ruptured aneurysms, aortic dissection, and peripheral neuropathy, has been reported although less frequently [19]. Gemcitabine and nabPTX, which are used as the protocol treatment in this trial, may cause peripheral neuropathy; therefore, patients in the levofloxacin combination arm in this trial will be monitored closely for exacerbations of peripheral neuropathy.

Several retrospective studies have reported that antibiotic treatment improves the therapeutic efficacy of GEM in patients with pancreatic cancer [8, 10,11,12]. Based on these results, the treatment efficacy of GEM may improve in the levofloxacin-treated group. In the future, we intend to conduct a Phase 3 clinical trial to evaluate the superiority of GEM/nabPTX and levofloxacin combination therapy over GEM/nabPTX therapy alone. If the addition of levofloxacin to GEM/nabPTX therapy improves the treatment efficacy of GEM/nabPTX therapy in future clinical trials, it can be used for improving the therapeutic outcomes of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. However, in a previous retrospective analysis, the incidence of leukopenia and neutropenia in gemcitabine-containing regimens was increased in patients treated with the levofloxacin combination [10]. The possibility of an increased incidence of leukopenia and neutropenia in the levofloxacin group will also be carefully monitored in this study. For sample size calculation, both PFS for the GEM/nabPTX group and for the GEM/nabPTX plus antibiotics group were required. A previous prospective study showed that the PFS of GEM/nabPTX therapy was 5.5 months, but this study did not include data to estimate the PFS with the addition of antibiotics [5]. Therefore, the data from the previous prospective study cannot be used to calculate the sample size in this study. And the sample size of this study was determined based on the data from previous retrospective analyses [10,11,12]. If the results of this study indicate that the addition of levofloxacin improves the therapeutic effect of GEM/nabPTX, this combined treatment may help to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer in the future.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AEs:

Adverse events

CDDL:

Cytidine deaminase long isoform

CI:

Confidence interval

DCR:

Disease control rate

EDC:

Electric Data Capture

FAS:

Full analysis set

FOLFIRINOX:

5-Fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin plus irinotecan

GEM/nabPTX:

Gemcitabine and nanoparticle albumin-binding paclitaxel

HRR:

Homologous recombination repair

jRCT:

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials

mOS:

Median overall survival

mPFS:

Median progression-free survival time

nabPTX:

Nanoparticle albumin-binding paclitaxel

PPS:

Per-protocol set

RR:

Response rate

References

  1. Fulop DJ, Zylberberg HM, Wu YL, Aronson A, Labiner AJ, Wisnivesky J, Cohen DJ, Sigel KM, Lucas AL. Association of Antibiotic Receipt With Survival Among Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Receiving Chemotherapy. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(3): e234254.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kane LE, Mellotte GS, Mylod E, O’Brien RM, O’Connell F, Buckley CE, Arlow J, Nguyen K, Mockler D, Meade AD, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Blood-based Biomarkers for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Cancer research communications. 2022;2(10):1229–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, Behrman SW, Benson AB, Cardin DB, Chiorean EG, Chung V, Czito B, Del Chiaro M, et al. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19(4):439–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouché O, Guimbaud R, Bécouarn Y, Adenis A, Raoul JL, Gourgou-Bourgade S, de la Fouchardière C, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1817–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, Chiorean EG, Infante J, Moore M, Seay T, Tjulandin SA, Ma WW, Saleh MN, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(18):1691–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Geller LT, Barzily-Rokni M, Danino T, Jonas OH, Shental N, Nejman D, Gavert N, Zwang Y, Cooper ZA, Shee K, et al. Potential role of intratumor bacteria in mediating tumor resistance to the chemotherapeutic drug gemcitabine. Science (New York, NY). 2017;357(6356):1156–60.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Riquelme E, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Montiel M, Zoltan M, Dong W, Quesada P, Sahin I, Chandra V, San Lucas A, et al. Tumor Microbiome Diversity and Composition Influence Pancreatic Cancer Outcomes. Cell. 2019;178(4):795-806.e712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Weniger M, Hank T, Qadan M, Ciprani D, Michelakos T, Niess H, Heiliger C, Ilmer M, D’Haese JG, Ferrone CR, et al. Influence of Klebsiella pneumoniae and quinolone treatment on prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2021;108(6):709–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zimmermann P, Curtis N. The effect of antibiotics on the composition of the intestinal microbiota - a systematic review. J Infect. 2019;79(6):471–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Imai H, Saijo K, Komine K, Otsuki Y, Ohuchi K, Sato Y, Okita A, Takahashi M, Takahashi S, Shirota H, et al. Antibiotic therapy augments the efficacy of gemcitabine-containing regimens for advanced cancer: a retrospective study. Cancer management and research. 2019;11:7953–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakano S, Komatsu Y, Kawamoto Y, Saito R, Ito K, Nakatsumi H, Yuki S, Sakamoto N. Association between the use of antibiotics and efficacy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic cancer. Medicine. 2020;99(39): e22250.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mohindroo C, Hasanov M, Rogers JE, Dong W, Prakash LR, Baydogan S, Mizrahi JD, Overman MJ, Varadhachary GR, Wolff RA, et al. Antibiotic use influences outcomes in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Cancer Med. 2021;10(15):5041–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chidiac C. Update on a proper use of systemic fluoroquinolones in adult patients (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin. SPILF.). Med Mal Infect. 2015;45(9):348–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wainberg ZA, Melisi D, Macarulla T, Pazo Cid R, Chandana SR, De La Fouchardière C, Dean A, Kiss I, Lee WJ, Goetze TO, et al. NALIRIFOX versus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in treatment-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (NAPOLI 3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet (London, England). 2023;402(10409):1272–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fang YT, Yang WW, Niu YR, Sun YK. Recent advances in targeted therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. World journal of gastrointestinal oncology. 2023;15(4):571–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Peng M, Ying Y, Zhang Z, Liu L, Wang W. Reshaping the Pancreatic Cancer Microenvironment at Different Stages with Chemotherapy. Cancers. 2023;15(9):2448. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers15092448.

  17. Iida N, Dzutsev A, Stewart CA, Smith L, Bouladoux N, Weingarten RA, Molina DA, Salcedo R, Back T, Cramer S, et al. Commensal bacteria control cancer response to therapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment. Science (New York, NY). 2013;342(6161):967–70.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu R, Rai A, Chen M, Suwakulsiri W, Greening DW, Simpson RJ. Extracellular vesicles in cancer - implications for future improvements in cancer care. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(10):617–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Baggio D, Ananda-Rajah MR. Fluoroquinolone antibiotics and adverse events. Aust Prescr. 2021;44(5):161–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Specific Clinical Trial Promotion Program, Tohoku University, 2022; the Clinical Trial Promotion Program, Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO), 2022; and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, 2022–2024.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai City, Japan

    Hiroo Imai, Masanobu Takahashi & Chikashi Ishioka

  2. Department of Medical Oncology, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki City, Japan

    Yasuhiro Sakamoto

  3. Chemotherapeutic Center, Sendai Kousei Hospital, Sendai City, Japan

    Shin Takahashi

  4. Department of Clinical Oncology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita City, Japan

    Hiroyuki Shibata

  5. Department of Medical Oncology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki City, Japan

    Atsushi Sato

  6. Department of Medical Oncology, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori City, Japan

    Kazunori Otsuka

  7. Department of Gastroenterology and Medical Oncology, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Kasama City, Japan

    Kenji Amagai

  8. Clinical Research, Innovation and Education Center, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai City, Japan

    Takuhiro Yamaguchi

  9. Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai City, Japan

    Hiroo Imai, Masanobu Takahashi & Chikashi Ishioka

Authors
  1. Hiroo Imai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yasuhiro Sakamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shin Takahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hiroyuki Shibata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Atsushi Sato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kazunori Otsuka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kenji Amagai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Masanobu Takahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Takuhiro Yamaguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Chikashi Ishioka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Hiroo Imai and Chikashi Ishioka drafted the manuscript. All coauthors have critically reviewed the protocol for this study. The principal investigator of this study is Chikashi Ishioka. Yasuhiro Sakamoto, Shin Takahashi, Hiroyuki Shibata, Atsushi Sato, Kazunori Otsuka, and Kenji Amagai are the principal investigators at the Collaborative Research Institute. Masanobu Takahashi is a co-investigator at Tohoku University Hospital. Takuhiro Yamaguchi is the chief statistician involved in the trial.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chikashi Ishioka.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The trial will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by Tohoku Certified Review Board of Tohoku University (approved number: 2022–6-085, approval date: January 31, 2023). The trial is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT; registry number: jRCTs021230005). Informed consent from each patient will be obtained by the principal investigator or co-investigators using an informed consent document. After obtaining written informed consent from the subjects, the principal investigator or co-investigator will confirm that the research participants meet all inclusion criteria.

An Efficacy and Safety Monitoring Committee will be formed to determine the need to continue the trial if severe AEs associated with the treatment protocol occur.

The results of this trial will be submitted to international peer-reviewed journals, and the main findings will be presented at international scientific conferences. Authorship is assigned according to the guidelines of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Chikashi Ishioka received a research funding from Tokyo Cooperative Oncology Group. Chikashi Ishioka also received contributions from Chugai Pharmaceutical; Novartis Pharma K.K.; Ono Pharmaceutical; MSD; Pfizer; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.; Janssen Pharmaceutical; Taiho Pharmaceutical; Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd.; Takeda Pharmaceutical; Merck Biopharma Co., Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K. K.; Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd.; and Incyte Biosciences Japan G.K. Chikashi Ishioka is a representative of the Tohoku Clinical Oncology Research and Education Society, a specified nonprofit corporation. Takuhiro Yamaguchi was a member of an endowed course established at the University of Tokyo and received income from the operating expenses of the endowed course until 2022. Donors for the endowed course included Nipro, Ltd. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplemental Table 1.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imai, H., Sakamoto, Y., Takahashi, S. et al. Efficacy of adding levofloxacin to gemcitabine and nanoparticle-albumin-binding paclitaxel combination therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial (T-CORE2201). BMC Cancer 24, 262 (2024). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12885-024-11973-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12885-024-11973-9

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us